Love, Al
Show Me The Grant Money!!!
BUT...give them enough Grant Money and they will prove it....
Then they'll croak
....and someone will disprove the provable...
and others will get Grant Money to prove that he didn't disprove it
And we're all Neanderthals as of this week!!!
I find it hilarious how these morons love to regurgitate their tired, old “energy independence” bull****! It’s a bigger crock than their “global cooling/global warming/climate change” scam. Denying the American people access to our natural resources isn’t what I’d call “energy independence”.
The SKY is WARMING!
.
bttt
“political assaults”
Yes, but it’s been political from the beginning. If you’re going to play that game, then don’t be surprised when the opposition does as well.
Love, Al
What exactly has science done for us lately?
Their letter, from the Pacific Institute, is nothing but propaganda, which is a just a continuation of all they have presented.
Hte actual rise in temp is much less than they claim. No one can consistently sense within 4 degrees F and that means other organisms are just as well adapted. Also, ~4 degrees F is 2K.
The average temp. of the Earth is 288K. The new total energy is 290K, if there's a 2K rise in T. That means there's only a 0.7% increase in the total energy of the system. According to the equipartition of energy principle, that means there'll only be a 0.7% increase in the average storm intensity, climate shift, or any other event.
Their claims are simply falsehoods and half truths presented as propaganda for the purpose of gaining control of political and economic decisions in general, and of the energy supply in particular.
So far, it just seems like a minor a$$-kicking of a few persistent moles who won’t just go back into their holes and get on with life.
It snowed here last week and it`s gonna snow tonight. That`s what I get for mowing the lawn.
Boy, this story is getting wide publication. The press can really spread the word when they want to.
Of course, you will never see a “skeptic’s” article get distributed and spread around like this in the MSM.
What ever it was it was not science because no peer review.
“The reality of anthropogenic climate change can no longer be debated on scientific grounds,” James Hurrell of the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research told the committee.”
I believe this statement to be the honest-to-God truth. After all, there would have to be some ‘science’ involved for a debate on scientific grounds to occur.
But I thought the Precautionary Principle required no action be taken until we are absolutely sure it won't have negative consequences?
Looks like they’ve reached the foot stamping stange.
Maybe they should stop spewing hot air, then.
Global Climate Change. Global Climate Hope. Yes, we global can.
This is what a real scientific report looks like. Testimony of The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley Before Congress May 6, 2010
http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/testimony_of_the_viscount_monckton_of_brenchley_before_congress_may_6_2010/