Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kagan's Goldman Ties Won't Hurt Supreme Court Chances, White House Says
wsj ^ | MAY 7, 2010 | LAURA MECKLER

Posted on 05/10/2010 12:42:15 PM PDT by george76

The White House said Friday that Elena Kagan's membership on an advisory panel for the securities firm Goldman Sachs Group Inc. wouldn't disqualify her for a position on the Supreme Court.

From 2005 to 2008, Ms. Kagan was a paid member of the Research Advisory Council of Goldman Sachs Global Markets Institute...

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrat; denial; elenakagan; goldman; goldmansachs; kagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2010 12:42:16 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

Is there anyone in the current administration that doesn’t have ties to GS?


2 posted on 05/10/2010 12:43:25 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Is there anyone in the current administration that doesn’t have ties to GS?

They don't work for GS. We all work for GS.

3 posted on 05/10/2010 12:46:51 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (we now live in a post-Obamapacolyptic world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

From 2005 to 2008, Ms. Kagan was a paid member of the Research Advisory Council of Goldman Sachs Global Markets Institute...”

Oh cripes.....shit, shit, shit...can the end come too soon for these bstrds?


4 posted on 05/10/2010 12:47:01 PM PDT by jessduntno (Kagan...Fili-bust her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Kagan's Goldman Ties Won't Hurt Supreme Court Chances, White House Says

...because she is a democrat.

5 posted on 05/10/2010 12:47:42 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
The tip of the iceberg. And eighty percent of the American voters you see driving down the highway haven't a clue.
6 posted on 05/10/2010 12:50:42 PM PDT by jnsun (The Left: the need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

....Music Playing Loudly.....

It’s an HISTORIC MOMENT! Three female Supreme’s!

I am so proud of my cuntry.


7 posted on 05/10/2010 12:52:25 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (Please God, watch over our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jnsun

I am afraid you are right.


8 posted on 05/10/2010 12:52:45 PM PDT by Tarpon (Obama-Speak ... the fusion of sophistry and Newspeak. It's not a gift, it's just lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

I guess we do.


9 posted on 05/10/2010 12:54:10 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

No whack left libs on the Supreme Court!


10 posted on 05/10/2010 12:54:51 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said the Goldman advisory group met once a year for a day-long conference about public-policy issues. "The group wasn't involved in making any investment decisions for the company," she said.

Looks like they're saying it's not a problem because these "advisers" were paid for doing nothing.

11 posted on 05/10/2010 12:58:59 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Nice.

Paid to do nothing


12 posted on 05/10/2010 1:01:56 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

“the Research Advisory Council”

You gotta love how these left wing nutjobs make up important sounding titles for themselves. I wonder what research she did? Many of these paid consultants are really “paid off”.

and can someone please tell me how in the hell wing nuts like this get these jobs? This is the Dean of Harvard Law School!

If I had gone to Harvard I would want my money back.

Sorry for the rant


13 posted on 05/10/2010 1:03:52 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Isn’t that like, a bribe?


14 posted on 05/10/2010 1:05:38 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Can around 25-30% moonbat base really steal the country from us and hold it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: george76; All

Doncha know?

Taking money from Evil Goldman is ONLY evil when they aren’t paying DEMOCRATS


15 posted on 05/10/2010 1:08:01 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Obama White House=Tammany Hall on the National Mall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Sure. Put movers and shakers on the advisory panel and pay them well to do nothing. Someday, GS may need a favor . . . .


16 posted on 05/10/2010 1:09:29 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

and can someone please tell me how in the hell wing nuts like this get these jobs? This is the Dean of Harvard Law School!”

Well, that Ahole in the WH was the Law Review Honcho.


17 posted on 05/10/2010 1:09:59 PM PDT by jessduntno (Kagan...Fili-bust her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: george76

...and how many dollars does Goldman have invested in “Cap & Tax”??.....but that CCX - Goldman case with all Obamassiah’s cronies knee deep in the make peolple buy AIR scam will NEVER make the USSC docket.....will it??


18 posted on 05/10/2010 1:10:07 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

But her and Sotomayer’s overrulings by big courts might.

Something smells in Obamaland.

Do we really want another one that has been overruled by the courts? I mean this woman wants to be on the highest court in the land and she is overruled as was Sotomayer.


19 posted on 05/10/2010 1:20:28 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

“Kagan’s Goldman Ties Won’t Hurt Supreme Court Chances, White House Says
...because she is a democrat.

I do believe we have a winner!


20 posted on 05/10/2010 1:48:47 PM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson