White House bristles at mention of Elena Kagan’s sexuality

The Daily Caller ^ | May 10, 2010 | Jon Ward

[DesertRenegade]

Call me crazy, but I don't think America is ready to have a bulldyke who calls her female husband 'Frank' making decisions that could affect this country for centuries.

[null and void]

*shrug* Ok, please to meet you, Mr Crazy...

[omega4179]

just wait till he replaces Ginsberg with a 3rd bull on the court.

[colorado tanker]

“It’s not anything I’m going to get into,”

Because you're a guy?

[albie]

The more dysfunctional the better as far as the kenyan is concerned. The longer the prison record, the larger the amount that was evaded on taxes, the more they hate America. There is no limit to the insanity.

[mylife]

“Elena went through the same vet that everyone else goes to”

Thats because she is a dog.

[sthguard]

Perhaps Westboro Baptist “Church” will show up at her confirmation hearings. ;-)

But seriously, since she’s already demonstrated her extreme anti-heterosexual bias at every opportunity, at this point her own “sexual orientation” is a moot point. We already know that she would side with the gays, and thus regardless of her personal life she is an enemy of moral governance.

[SpinnerWebb]

"Elena went through the same vet that everyone else goes through"

Which, apparently, is NONE!

[MrB]

“Elena went through the same vet “

uh...

[colorado tanker]

“That’s just a broad answer.”

You really can't make this stuff up.

[Responsibility2nd]

Top White House officials bristled Monday when asked whether they think Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan’s sexuality will become an issue in her confirmation hearings.

“It’s not anything I’m going to get into,” said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs

______________________________________________

Of course not, Mr. Gibbs. No man ever has.

My suggestion? Send Janet over. SHE’LL get into it all right.

[MrB]

You brought up a good point.
Most conservatives will have “tolerance” for minority cultures and lifestyles,

as long as the same courtesy is extended from them to us.

It isn’t.

[End Times Sentinel]

Gibbs was asked a handful of times about rumors that Kagan is gay, and gave terse responses each time.

Gay? I think we're jumping the gun a little here.

Let's first determine if she's actually a woman. She looks like the spawn of a bizarre Mike Myers/Nathan Lane/Matthew Broderick gene splice.

Given The One's predilection for masculine Clintonistas, can a nomination for Jake Reno be far behind?

[freedomwarrior998]

Nominating an open pervert to the Court is unconscionable. There is no excuse. She needs to be filibustered.

[ClearCase_guy]

“Mr. Gibbs, is she ashamed of who she is? Does she think there is something wrong with that sort of lifestyle?”

[MinorityRepublican]

You may be correct, but personally I don’t care what she does in her bedroom as long as she’s an originalist Justice who actually doesn’t treat the Constitution as a “living document”.

[equalitybeforethelaw]

““It’s not anything I’m going to get into,” said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs”

I can only guess the WH has a don’t ask, don’t tell policy in effect for Supreme Nominees. I wonder why?

[Tarpon]

Butch is a bulldyke? You mean she is a unicorn?

[Osage Orange]

“That’s just a broad answer.”

ROFLOL!!!

Oh the irony........

[pillut48]

When asked what the White House was defending Kagan from, Gibbs said: “That’s just a broad answer.”

Oh, Beltway Bob did NOT use the word BROAD (in gay purple) in a sentence about Kagan, did he??? LOL. Will the lesbians of the US protest his BIGOTED remarks about one of their 'sisters' (which I'm really not sure is a factual description of Kagan)?? /sarc

And FWIW, DR, I don't think you're crazy. I don't want another bigoted 'justice' on SCOTUS. Period. What is with all this crap about her being 'for the little guys/people/dienfranchised/whatever'??? A justice is NOT supposed to be FOR or AGAINST anyone--they are supposed to be UNBIASED and IMPARTIAL! D'oh!! >:-(