Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152773 ^

Posted on 05/12/2010 4:24:22 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: deport
Note: One should not make too much of the “geographical code.” It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

******

Do you have any explanation/theory as to why Obama has the first 3 Social Security numbers that seem to belong to persons who applied in Connecticut as opposed to the first 3 numbers that a person applying in Hawaii would be expected to have? Thanks.

101 posted on 05/12/2010 4:28:36 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

Nope, no info or theory and don’t know for a fact what his ss # is..


102 posted on 05/12/2010 5:27:31 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
I'm sorry, but could you please explain further what the screenshot of Obama's selective service form has to do with this Social Security Connecticut number controversy? Thanks

It shows that an official government record exists in which he used that number and it is not an erroneous entry from a database.

103 posted on 05/12/2010 8:34:59 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher
I'm sorry, but could you please explain further what the screenshot of Obama's selective service form has to do with this Social Security Connecticut number controversy? Thanks

It shows that an official government record exists in which he used that number and it is not an erroneous entry from a database.

******

"That number": I'm confused, so could you please explain what "that number" refers to? Thanks.

104 posted on 05/13/2010 12:29:05 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher
Here is the screenshot of the Selective Service record that shows he used that number.

******

I'm confused in reading Obama's Selective Service form. So, could someone point out the Social Security number on it? Thanks.

Is it just me, or is Obama's signature on the Selective Service form so different from the signature Obama uses today?

It is as if someone other than Obama signed the Selective Service form.

NOTE: I have pointed out this obvious difference in Obama's signatures for many months, so this is not the first time I have pointed out the difference.

105 posted on 05/13/2010 12:43:06 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
I'm confused in reading Obama's Selective Service form. So, could someone point out the Social Security number on it? Thanks.

The Social Security number doesn't appear on the Selective Service form. What does appear is his Selective Service number.

Now if you go on the Selective Service site and look up a record with his name, date of birth, , and the 042 Social Security number,a record exists that matches the Selective Service number he was issued.It is all explained here:

Link

106 posted on 05/13/2010 1:31:05 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

Now if you are referring to the card that he filled out, it is probably in the blacked out section since they can’t reveal that info.


107 posted on 05/13/2010 4:19:35 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
"Social security numbers are issued at birth"

That is not exactly true. They are now. But I was born in 1965 and didn't have a SS# issued until 1976 or so. It is different now.
108 posted on 05/13/2010 6:51:33 AM PDT by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson