Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bruinbirdman

I call BS, too many places this does not fit.


7 posted on 05/13/2010 3:40:59 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Navy Patriot
This has been reported before by US sources. The description of this episode by the Chinese is likely intended for their domestic public as part of a more open discussion of nuclear security issues from the Chinese national perspective.

Being widely despised by the Chinese people for corruption and lack of democracy and rule of law, and with economic performance faltering, the communist regime must inevitably emphasize nationalistic themes as a basis of legitimacy. The depiction of foreigners as dangerous and untrustworthy is a long established element of Chinese nationalism.

23 posted on 05/13/2010 4:45:32 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot
The Sino-Soviet border war was no secret at the time. It is plausible that the Soviets would consider a 'decisive solution' at the time, for China was relatively very weak, with a nascent nuclear program but no real deterrent power. It would have been an ideal time for the USSR to establish continental hegemony across the entire Eurasian landmass once and for all.

Nixon was the man with enough foreign policy savvy to realize that a fullblown war between the two Asian behemoths would be a worldwide catastrophe. This is why the Chinese had great respect for Nixon, despite his antipathy to communism.

36 posted on 05/13/2010 7:11:34 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

I got taught this twenty years past (American sources), save for the threat of US nuc lear threats. At the time, the analysis was that the US were tempted but too smart to stand by and watch the Sovs destroy China. In a three way conflict, you always assist or prevent the destruction of the weakest member. Had the Sovs been allowed to take out China then:

A - The US would have been partners (albeit through inaction) in a bloody crime, because I doubt the Sovs could have done it without a few nukes in civilian zones and millions dead

and

B - The USSR would have had the luxury of not having to be nervous about their horrendously long land border with China, or with China’s influence over the international communist groups. That would have simplified Soviet strategic needs greatly, to the detriment of the west.

China and the US had nothing in common politically save distrust of the Soviets, but without China the Sovs would have been a much more credible threat. Even though China never matched Russia remotely in terms of strngth, they had the North Korean factor - e.g. the Russians were never sure what that crazy old bastard Mao would do, so they had to be given either careful treatment or all-out treatment.


42 posted on 05/14/2010 8:08:09 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson