Skip to comments.
CA: Tom McClintock Ballot Recommendations (June 8, 2010 primary election)
tommcclintock.com ^
| 14 May 2010
Posted on 05/14/2010 4:43:29 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: SoConPubbie
So the following endorsements are RINOs?No, of course not. That's not even the point.
As a matter fact, I am not even really "sick of Sarah". I am sick of the subject of Sarah. I am sick of everything on the planet, including the weather, being used as a reason to talk about Srah, positively or negatively. Sarah Palin is just not that damn interesting or important enough to turn into an obsession.
Subject: "CA: Tom McClintock Ballot Recommendations (June 8, 2010 primary election), " It's got absolutely nothing to with Sarah Palin, but it's already turned into the Palinistas vs the anti-Palinistas, like its some holy war.
61
posted on
05/14/2010 7:18:23 PM PDT
by
Bokababe
(Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: Bokababe
Subject: "CA: Tom McClintock Ballot Recommendations (June 8, 2010 primary election), " It's got absolutely nothing to with Sarah Palin, but it's already turned into the Palinistas vs the anti-Palinistas, like its some holy war.
Well, if you want it to stop, you need to direct your ire at the Palin haters.
None of this Sarah posting comes up on a non-Sarah thread, until some coward decides to use it as an excuse to distort the truth and bash Sarah.
To: Bokababe
Subject: "CA: Tom McClintock Ballot Recommendations (June 8, 2010 primary election), " It's got absolutely nothing to with Sarah Palin, but it's already turned into the Palinistas vs the anti-Palinistas, like its some holy war.
Oh, and one more thing, you are right about this thread having nothing to do with Sarah, and I agree with you that I wish people would stay on topic.
To: SoConPubbie
"Well, if you want it to stop, you need to direct your ire at the Palin haters."Actually not. Her name 1st came up on post #9 & didn't stop.
64
posted on
05/14/2010 7:31:30 PM PDT
by
Bokababe
(Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: Kickass Conservative
If you are referring to President G.W. Bush, please show some respect. No reference to the office. Discussing partisans. In this specific case, Republican presidential candidates claiming conservative credentials.
My view is that George Walker Bush, 43rd President of the United States, gets all the credit that he deserves and is entitled to the respect that comes with the office.
To: fieldmarshaldj
Tom did not have the votes. He needs to come to grips with this fact.
66
posted on
05/14/2010 7:34:47 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: repubpub
Toms no RINO. He knows Poizner and his record. He also knows of Whitman and her policies. Toms simply picking someone the Republicans can swing to there side on critical choices. Poizner is not the best choice for CA gov, but Whitman is worse.Completely agree. Tom & Poizner have worked together before, so he is a known quantity.
67
posted on
05/14/2010 7:36:52 PM PDT
by
Bokababe
(Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: Bokababe
Actually not. Her name 1st came up on post #9 & didn't stop.
Well, you got me there, this time
However, read through most of these episodes and it is exactly what I posted, it is the negative, unfounded, unsupportable, and distorted postings by Anti-Palin people that starts the whole battle over and over again.
If you expect it to stop, then the distorted and untrue attacks have to stop first.
To: BunnySlippers; fieldmarshaldj
Tom did not have the votes. He needs to come to grips with this fact.
No, that wasn't the case.
If the GOP establishment had gotten behind Tom he would have won.
To: SoConPubbie
You're continual dishonest and incorrect posting about how Governor Palin "quit" her Governorship, implying that there was no cause, shows you to be a Palin Hater. You're means you are. How is it dishonest to say she 'quit' when she 'quit? And in what weird little universe does one post referring to her 'quitting' constitute continual posting.
Do yourself a favor and don't further embarrass yourself by replying. You're (see...you are!) not up to it.
70
posted on
05/14/2010 7:50:18 PM PDT
by
pgkdan
(I Miss Ronald Reagan!)
To: Finny
71
posted on
05/14/2010 7:55:03 PM PDT
by
Finny
("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
To: CounterCounterCulture
72
posted on
05/14/2010 8:02:08 PM PDT
by
marsh2
To: SoConPubbie
However, read through most of these episodes and it is exactly what I posted, it is the negative, unfounded, unsupportable, and distorted postings by Anti-Palin people that starts the whole battle over and over again. If you expect it to stop, then the distorted and untrue attacks have to stop first.Yeah, I'll send out a memo on that.
73
posted on
05/14/2010 10:31:14 PM PDT
by
Bokababe
(Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: CounterCounterCulture
Prop. 17. Insurance Rates. YES: A simple question: should drivers be able to take their continuous coverage discount with them when they change insurance companies? A simpler question: why are our laws such a micro managing mess that we have to vote on something as self-evident as this in the first place?
He's asking us? Who wrote the law preventing it?
74
posted on
05/14/2010 11:37:35 PM PDT
by
lewislynn
(What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
To: darkangel82
75
posted on
05/15/2010 12:50:45 AM PDT
by
Judges Gone Wild
(Who is this uncircumcised, to oppose the armies of The Living God?)
To: rintense
Perfection is limited and static. If people thought there was a perfect candidate, they would worship him/her, like all the mouth-breathers who idolize Obama. This is dangerous. (Stalin, Hitler, Mao, anyone?) We were made to worship Jesus Christ, the God-Man. He is the only sinless human being. He was able to do such because of his divinity and his constant communication with His Father. We need to pray for Mrs. Palin and all our political leaders.
76
posted on
05/15/2010 1:12:01 AM PDT
by
Judges Gone Wild
(Who is this uncircumcised, to oppose the armies of The Living God?)
To: All
“For U.S. Senate, Chuck DeVore: Chuck is a conservatives conservative who has always stood on principle, even when it has meant standing virtually alone. Ive never heard him give a speech without thinking I wish Id said that. I rank him up there with Sam Aanestad as one of the finest people Ive had the opportunity to serve with in the legislature. He would become an instant leader in the United States Senate.”
B U M P !!
77
posted on
05/15/2010 6:38:32 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: CounterCounterCulture
There are slim pickings for conservatives in the governors race this year, and in California campaigns by necessity must be waged on the airwaves. Advantage Whitman.
78
posted on
05/15/2010 7:05:34 AM PDT
by
mac_truck
( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
To: CounterCounterCulture
For Governor, Steve Poizner: Steve had the courage to support Arizonas decision to enforce our immigration laws when Meg Whitman cut and ran. He opposes the bank bailouts, rampant borrowing and environmental extremism that Meg Whitman embraces. And unlike Whitman, Steve Poizner was never a huge fan of radical leftist Van Jones. This time, lets have a governor from the Republican wing of the Republican Party. I love Tom, wish he were on the top of the state's ballot instead of Meggy and Stevie.....But wait.....There are a few others on the ballot on June 8. Why are they not considered?
About two months ago, our group first met one of these "other" candidates and were, and are,very impressed by his openness and honesty....and by his conservative and constitutional values. Believe me, we questioned him mercilessly on many issues vital to the future of our state and nation, and he was spot on with every answer.
Trouble is, these "other" people don't have the millions of Poizner, or the billions of Whitman to throw around and buy the title of Governor, thereby soothing their tremendous ego, as Arnold did. All they have is a message and integrity....two things that the front runners seriously lack!
Dismiss them if you will, but at least take a look and a listen before you do.
Ken Miller will be appearing at a rally or a Tea Party near you in the coming 3 1/2 weeks. Be there!
To: CounterCounterCulture
80
posted on
05/15/2010 8:25:16 AM PDT
by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson