Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rmlew
So now the mere mention of fact is anti-semitism? Maybe Catholics should start complaining that Pat is being anti-Catholic for pointing out that the court is now 2/3 Catholic.

Pat doesn't point the finger at Jews. He points the finger at Democrats who have not nominated a white, Christian to the court in nearly 50 years. 50 years! Not so for Republicans, who have nominated protestants to the court, the most recent being Harriet Miers (who would have been a disaster), David Souter, Robert Bork, Rehnquist, and O'Connor. The Republican presidents chose protestants to fill 5 out of the last 8 vacancies with two being rejected in favor of Catholic candidates (one only after the failed nomination of a Jew, Douglas Ginsburg).

Last point. Out of the Catholics on the court (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, Sotomayor, and Alito) who would you rather not have?

Out of the Jews on the court (Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan she'll be confirmed, we all know it) who would you rather not have?

Pat is Scotch-Irish. Not Irish. Most Scotch-Irish are Presbyterian, not Catholic (Buchanan is an exception to the rule). Anyone who claims to have supported Buchanan at one time surely should know this.

26 posted on 05/16/2010 7:44:14 AM PDT by grand wazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: grand wazoo
So now the mere mention of fact is anti-semitism? Maybe Catholics should start complaining that Pat is being anti-Catholic for pointing out that the court is now 2/3 Catholic.
Buchanan is only complaining now not when Catholics became a majority. Given his persistant desire to name Jewish neoconservatives (and ignore Catholic ones)and his animosity to the Jewish State, it is hard not to draw an inference.

Pat doesn't point the finger at Jews.
Pat considers the Democrats dominated by Jews. QED.

Last point. Out of the Catholics on the court (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, Sotomayor, and Alito) who would you rather not have?
Kennedy and Sotomayor.

Out of the Jews on the court (Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan she'll be confirmed, we all know it) who would you rather not have?
All of them. Lox loving leftists mean nothing to me. (Except when I'm standing in line at Zabars.)

Pat is Scotch-Irish. Not Irish. Most Scotch-Irish are Presbyterian, not Catholic (Buchanan is an exception to the rule). Anyone who claims to have supported Buchanan at one time surely should know this.
It was an assumptions given the rarity of Catholic Scots-Irish. 99 out of 100 times, I'd be correct.

33 posted on 05/16/2010 11:39:09 AM PDT by rmlew (There is no such thing as a Blue Dog Democrat; just liberals who lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson