Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: avacado

If your father and mother took a tax exemption for you, they were subsidized. There are great expense incurred by having and raising a child. IAC. not likely you and I can come to agreement because you seem to buy the statist argument that society is no more than a collective of individuals, that the institution of marriage did not exist prior to the state and therefore has natural rights that the state is bound to respect. Marriage as defined by law imposes duties and obligations, even those apart from rearing children not borne by single individuals therefore a married couple ought to be given special consideration


81 posted on 05/16/2010 11:18:14 AM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
"If your father and mother took a tax exemption for you, they were subsidized."

Child credits didn't exist back then nor did marriage credits. They did have dependent deductions. All three of those should be banished. It amazes me that some people feel they have a right for me to carry a heavier tax burden just because I am not married nor have a child. Get the damn federal government out of marriage all together and the gay marriage issue becomes moot and the married people and those with kids need to start paying their fair share of the taxes and quit being subsidized (welfare) by the government.

85 posted on 05/16/2010 12:51:01 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson