Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cannibalizing Capital (The City of Detroit intends to knock down 10,000 homes and buildings)
American Thinker ^ | 05/18/2010 | John F. Di Leo

Posted on 05/18/2010 10:32:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2010 10:32:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Detroit has lost it’s mind.............


2 posted on 05/18/2010 10:39:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you'll know that its desolation is NEAR. Luke 21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Economies aren't based on building things, destroying them, and starting over again from scratch, time and time again.

This guy has never heard of Joseph Schumpeter.

3 posted on 05/18/2010 10:41:43 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
When there are no good solutions in sight, the least bad option is the right choice.

A long series of mistakes got Detroit to where it is. Tearing down these empty buildings might be a good sign. It shows a belated connection with reality. Left empty, these houses would just attract squatters. It also costs too much to continue serving a neighbourhood, where most of the buildings are vacant.

4 posted on 05/18/2010 10:42:56 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll always wonder now if the ‘Homesteading’ proposed by Jack Kemp for these blighted areas would have worked.
Ah, well, the Socialists find another way to misalocate resources and blame the capitalists!


5 posted on 05/18/2010 10:43:08 AM PDT by griswold3 (Immigration solution: Tall Fences, Wide Gates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good article about a great teachable moment.

Only fools believe you can cut your way into prosperity.


6 posted on 05/18/2010 10:45:24 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I don't get it. Why don't they let the owners sell the houses cheaper? Or if for some reason the city holds title, auction them off to the highest bidder?

Surely they're not being influenced by friends in the real-estate business who hold lots of inventory that they bought too dear. Government-induced scarcity? Impossible, pardon my leaping to conclusions.

7 posted on 05/18/2010 10:46:13 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

You can buy a house in Detroit for less than a car.


8 posted on 05/18/2010 10:47:17 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
It's simply amazing how quickly a frame and fiberboard house can turn into a piece of junk when it's not occupied.

Best that Detroit get cracking and knock down the 100,000+ surplus pieces of trashboard they have scattered around the area.

Detroit jumped the gun on the Interstate highway race back in the 1950s and 1960s and didn't take long enough to plan what they'd like to get rid of.

Not too late though.

9 posted on 05/18/2010 10:48:05 AM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Philosophy of “Deconstruction” made concrete.


10 posted on 05/18/2010 10:48:20 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot
I don't get it. Why don't they let the owners sell the houses cheaper?

Who do you sell it to ? No one wants to buy. Who wants to live or start a business in that city ? Some houses have their prices slashed to less than $10,000 already (Yep, less than the price of a second hand Toyota) and still no takers.
11 posted on 05/18/2010 10:50:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is the end result of Socialism. The productive economy disappears. No one is left to pay for the hand outs that 3/4 of the population get. You have a ghost town filled with buildings with nothing going on in them. No one wants to buy even a nice house in the area because there is nothing to do there to make a living. People just flat out forget how to be self-sufficient. The land reverts to its natural state. The standard of living declines rapidly to the point of a Third World nation. Its scary how quickly parts of America can revert to Third World status.


12 posted on 05/18/2010 10:51:28 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Somebody have a brother-in-law in the demolition business? Just another way to redistribute wealth into the thugs pockets.


13 posted on 05/18/2010 10:52:08 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, did PONTIAC finally win his war against Fort Detroit?

For those out of the loop, read THE CONSPIRACY OF PONTIAC by Francis Parkman.


14 posted on 05/18/2010 10:52:49 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (VIVA LOS SB1070)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...

If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.


15 posted on 05/18/2010 10:54:33 AM PDT by grellis (I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ve no idea of the condition of these 10K buildings but Detroit is full of homes that would cost more to properly renovate than they would ever be worth.

While knocking down the homes alone won’t make things better it is a sign that, finally, Detroit get’s just how much trouble they are in. Right now Detroit needs some seriously good urban planning if they want to save the city

1) Getting rid of the homes that can not be salvaged and *giving* the land to the adjacent homeowner (if the owner lives there) on the condition that the property is properly cared for (landscaped/maintained) for a decade

2) If the lot(s) are big enough give the land land to small businesses or corporations who will serve the neighborhoods with near by jobs and services. This can and should include corporations that have small footprint shops and stores.

3) Forgiving all real estate taxes on the property given to business that employ people who live in Detroit.

4) Reduce the size of government by reducing council seats

5) Increase the number of charters granted for charter schools that are neighborhood based to reduce the cost of busing.


16 posted on 05/18/2010 10:56:15 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

as soon as they’re done knocking down 10,000 homes they’ll be screaming for more Federal Aid for the Homeless


17 posted on 05/18/2010 10:56:39 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

Some houses cant be given away, quite literally...

A house abandoned for a year needs a lot of repair... A shoddy house abandoned for a decade is beyond salvage.


18 posted on 05/18/2010 10:57:13 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

60 years ago, the city of Hiroshima was a total wreck with no buildings left standing and people starving everywhere.

60 years ago, Detroit was one of the world’s most thriving cities and the industrial engine of the USA. 80% of the world’s automobiles and engines were made in Detroit. The city had a vibrant, thriving cultural scene as well.

Now, 60 years later, as we look at Hiroshima vs Detroit, we might as well ask ourselves -— who the heck won the war?


19 posted on 05/18/2010 11:00:46 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I like the article, but I wouldn’t take the author at face value:

“Houses worth $100K, $200K, $500K, and more will be destroyed.”

So, he would pay 1,2 or 5k right now for them? Really?

Uh huh...


20 posted on 05/18/2010 11:02:00 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson