Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

MDN: You also stated on Kentucky Tonight that: ‘I think that it’s a mistake to legislate morality and health from the state.’ We’ve talked about healthcare and privacy. You’re pro-life. Are there any exceptions to that?

RP: Yes, in the case of the mortality of the mother.

MDN: What about instances of rape or incest or where the outcome may not be death, but severe medical problems for the mother or child. Do you think that in these cases the decision should be left to the government rather than the families?

RP: In cases of rape, trying to prevent pregnancies is obviously the best thing. The morning-after pill works successfully most of the time. Ultimately we do better if we do have better education about family planning.

With partial-birth abortion, there were five women who testified that it threatened their life. It wasn’t completely true in all cases. They were non-viable babies. They were babies with awful genetic mutations that were not going to survive, and I tend to think we let nature take its course.

http://www.middlesborodailynews.com/view/full_story/5661743/article-US-Senate-hopeful-Rand-Paul-visits-Middlesboro?instance=home_news_lead

Pro-life, but partial birth abortion is acceptable?


56 posted on 05/19/2010 12:29:13 PM PDT by DakotaRed (What happened to the country I fought for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: DakotaRed

So no abortion at all? Even spontaneous? Should the Mother be tried for murder if she miscarries?


59 posted on 05/19/2010 12:32:03 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson