Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge wants details on school tax proposal (Fed judge to impose tax w/o vote)
The (Baton Rouge) Advocate ^ | May 20, 2010 | Bill Lodge

Posted on 05/20/2010 5:15:52 AM PDT by abb

A Baton Rouge federal judge said Wednesday he wants details on a plan to tax St. Helena Parish residents for public school improvements without calling an election.

Parish and state officials also announced that low-performing St. Helena Central Middle School will be taken over by Louisiana’s Recovery School District.

U.S. District Judge James J. Brady told School Board officials at a court hearing in the parish’s 57-year-old desegregation suit: “All of you get together, come up with a schedule.”

Within a month, the judge said, he wants details on how the plan would “put some money into the system.”

Earlier this month, St. Helena voters rejected a ballot proposition that would have raised $2.1 million annually for 20 years. It was the fourth proposed property tax to be defeated in three years.

Nelson Dan Taylor Sr., the School Board’s attorney, told Brady it is impossible to obtain voter approval for public schools in St. Helena Parish.

Taylor asked the judge for permission to impose a tax without an election in order to raise money for school facilities and raise teacher salaries to the levels of wealthier parishes in the area.

At $30,254 per year, starting teachers’ salaries are about $12,000 less than those of surrounding parishes, St. Helena Superintendent Daisy Slan said last month. She said that makes it difficult for St. Helena to attract and retain teachers.

“Those children have suffered enough,” Taylor told Brady on Wednesday.

The judge welcomed the taxation proposal and said he plans to visit school facilities in St. Helena Parish and meet there with members of the School Board.

Brady also noted that questions have been raised about the possibility that board members have violated open-meetings laws during recent discussions about the lingering litigation. The aging dispute pre-dates the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1954 landmark desegregation decision in the Kansas case of Brown vs. Board of Education.

Last week, 21st Judicial District Attorney Scott Perrilloux’s staff announced that an investigation has been opened into an April status conference in the St. Helena case. That conference with Brady in Baton Rouge was attended by four of the School Board’s members — Elijah Harvey, Brenda Hurst, Willie Lee and James Baker.

Another board member, Alton Travis, filed a complaint in which he alleged he was not notified of the court conference, Assistant District Attorney Cliff Speed said last week.

“I may in the future meet with the board in closed session,” Brady announced Wednesday.

The judge added that such meetings would not violate the state’s Open Meetings Laws because board members would be discussing pending litigation and would not be taking any formal action.

Winston G. Decuir Sr., a Baton Rouge attorney for the Louisiana Department of Education, told Brady that department officials are in agreement with one of the School Board’s proposals.

“We have no position in regard to Mr. Taylor’s proposal for local taxation,” Decuir told the judge. “We are prepared to take over the school. And we wish them well.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: federaljudge; louisiana; schools; taxes
The federal judge is the former chairman of Louisiana's Democratic Party.
1 posted on 05/20/2010 5:15:52 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rrstar96; Uncle Sham; jubail; TornadoAlley3; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; dixiechick2000; kms61; ...

ping


2 posted on 05/20/2010 5:16:18 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Tax increase by judicial fiat seems to me to be grounds for a revolt, actually not a revolt because revolting means fighting against a legal authority. How about dealing with theft of belongings and protecting yourself from such.


3 posted on 05/20/2010 5:19:59 AM PDT by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Soooo...what happens if the people tell the judge to shove it?

I mean seriously: To paraphrase Andrew Jackson: he made his ruling now let him enforce it.

So what if the people simple refuse to pay?

LIKE THEY ALREADY HAVE DONE????

How can this even remotely be considered constitutional????


4 posted on 05/20/2010 5:24:28 AM PDT by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09! WTFU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

A federal judge in Kansas City raised taxes for years to support Kansas City schools, all without approval or vote by the taxpayers. He not only raised taxes in Jackson County (where KC is located), but in the surrounding Missouri counties as well. He couldn’t do that in the bordering Kansas counties, so many people moved to Kansas.


5 posted on 05/20/2010 5:35:22 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder
How can this even remotely be considered constitutional????

If he gets away with it, what's written on a piece of paper makes no difference.

6 posted on 05/20/2010 5:45:29 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb

Thats very true. Then we become ruled by men and not laws. At that point, I feel free to raise a single digit in defiance.

If the law means nothing then a slavish obedience to it is insanity.

I am amazed at just how fragile this system is.

All it takes is a sheriff to refuse to enforce or the people to simply say no: we do not give you the power over us any more and it will crack crumble and fall....

I don’t KNOW that such a thing can happen......


7 posted on 05/20/2010 5:51:58 AM PDT by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09! WTFU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb
A few years ago, a judge in Kansas ordered the state legislature to put more money in the school budget. I said at that time they should just thank the judge for his opinion and proceed with their budget as planned. Of course, they didn't have the backbone.

Here we have another example of a judge overstepping his bounds. Lets hope the legislators in Louisiana have a bit more backbone and will tell this judge to stick to judging and keep his nose out of the legislature's business.

8 posted on 05/20/2010 5:58:12 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Nevada as well. A court tossed out their requirement for a legislative supermajority to raise taxes. Case was about funding for the public schools...you know, For the Chil’in.

What part of POWER OF THE PURSE do they not understand?
Especially after attending LAW SCHOOL???


9 posted on 05/20/2010 6:08:46 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Taxation without representation is coming!


10 posted on 05/20/2010 6:08:47 AM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder; abb

If the government is not guided by laws then neither should we be.


11 posted on 05/20/2010 6:10:32 AM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Look up the entomology of the term, “You're fired”.
12 posted on 05/20/2010 6:28:06 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Moon Griffon to weigh in on this today.

http://www.moongriffon.com/


13 posted on 05/20/2010 6:43:33 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96; Uncle Sham; jubail; TornadoAlley3; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; dixiechick2000

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/

St. Helena Tea Party to Fight Lawless Fed Judge
05/23/2010 by Walter Abbott

St. Helena Parish is about to form a tea party to fight precisely what our forefathers fought over 200 years ago – taxation without representation. Alton Travis, a 12-year St. Helena school board member, has begun preliminary efforts to organize a group. “I’ve made some phone calls and I’m putting together a contact list,” Travis said.

We spoke with Mr. Travis earlier today from his home near Kentwood.

Last week, Lincoln Parish News Online (LPNO) had reported about U. S. District Judge James Brady’s plans to impose a tax upon St. Helena residents without a vote. Brady is the former chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party.

Travis said he has been in contact with the Baton Rouge Tea Party (BRTP) for help in organizing a group in St. Helena Parish. “I really don’t know why we’re talking about this,” said Travis in reference to taxes imposed by a judge contrary to voter’s wishes. “Things like that shouldn’t even be contemplated.”

Parish voters had previously turned down several attempts to pass new school taxes. On May 1, parish voters rejected a 55 mil property tax by a 62% margin. The tax issue has gone back over twenty years, according to Travis, and has been voted upon at least a dozen times.

Some have tried to portray a negative vote on school taxes as a racist vote, but as the parish is 52% black, it is clear that many blacks voted no on the tax. LPNO readers will recall how last fall’s defeat of a Baton Rouge tax was painted as “racist” by The (Baton Rouge) Advocate.

St. Helena is a rural parish with no significant tax base. Years ago, the area had several dairy farms, but that property now grows trees. Travis said if a tax is imposed, several property owners have told him they will file bankruptcy because they wouldn’t be able to afford the taxes. The school system consists of one elementary school, one middle school that has been taken over by the Louisiana Recovery School District (RSD), and one high school.

The taxes would fund pay raises for the district’s teachers and also fund new construction. Asked what condition are the district’s buildings, Travis said they’re in as good a condition as thirty-five years ago when he attended.

The school board is also under investigation for holding meetings without notifying all the board members.


14 posted on 05/23/2010 8:39:23 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson