Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie
Jim Geraghty is right on this one. I made the exact same point on this PA-12 election on several threads yesterday.

The Democratic candidate won in the PA-12 election because the Democratic turnout was higher than usual due to the high-profile, hotly-contested statewide primary election between Sestak and Specter.

Pat Toomey is already the GOP nominee for the U.S. Senate race, so there was no comparable high-profile statewide race to bring GOP voters out.

It's also worth noting that Pennsylvania has a "closed" primary system, so independents weren't involved in the primary election anyway and therefore had less incentive to show up for the PA-12 election.

11 posted on 05/20/2010 7:24:32 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
It's also worth noting that Pennsylvania has a "closed" primary system, so independents weren't involved in the primary election anyway and therefore had less incentive to show up for the PA-12 election.

Did you know this. I didn't. Sure puts a different light on Tuesdays results in PA-12

15 posted on 05/20/2010 7:30:41 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
Thanks for the excellent insight. I did not know that point that Indys were not a big factor in Tuesdays results.
16 posted on 05/20/2010 7:31:47 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson