Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigun
While communistic social engineering wasn't on the horizon -- Marx had not yet been born -- there was plenty of social engineering favored by the churches in England. In fact, the Tory Party was the party of the Monarchy and the Established Church, and Tories had no problem with using the tax system to procure socially favorable outcomes. Hamilton slides into this position in an earlier paper where he pushes the idea of a tax on alcohol to curb drunkenness.

Hamilton did not foresee that the government's appetite for money would become so ravenous.

What tickled me in this essay was that Hamilton anticipated Laffer by two centuries. (Or did Laffer read his Hamilton?)

11 posted on 05/20/2010 5:53:06 PM PDT by Publius (Unless the Constitution is followed, it is simply a piece of paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Publius
Hamilton did not foresee that the government's appetite for money would become so ravenous.

Indeed! Hamilton was well aware of the "chains" in the Constitution put there to bind down the federal government but those have been broken and discarded first by Lincoln and then by every mercantile progressive since.

14 posted on 05/20/2010 7:04:11 PM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson