This administration can not accomplish their agenda if innocent, law abiding citizens can own guns. What’s that tell you.... It is pretty clear that the 2A reads “shall not be infringed”. What part of “shall not be infringed” don’t they “understand”.
It bodes well that such questions are finally being adjudicated.
SnakeDoc
The government continues to argue to the court that the Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution should be the guiding rule for the coming decision.
Please consider joining the Obamacare Class Action lawsuit:
Obamacare Class Action Lawsuit (deadline to join is May 31)
"The purpose of this lawsuit is to reverse Supreme Court precedent related to the Commerce clause and thereby overturn Obamacare. The Supreme Court has historically erred in its interpretation of the Constitutional role of the Federal Government. Recent Supreme Court rulings hint that they may be willing to take another look at Commerce clause precedent. Obamacare is so over reaching and so onerous, that it must either be repealed in Congress or struck down in the courts. We must fight this on both fronts. This is our historic opportunity to reverse America’s trend toward Socialism by overturning this unconstitutional precedent.
If you are a US citizen and agree with the goal of this lawsuit, please join us. If you have concerns about joining, please review the FAQs for more information. Every person we add strengthens the voice of "We the People".
If the Feds think that States’ growing gun-rights movement is a threat now, just wait until a Revolution breaks out.
And if they did offer them in your state, would you buy an intrastate fully auto rifle, if it meant you were violating a conflicting federal law (ie. would you be a voluntary test case)?