a 2005 letter about Shea that current Bishop Michael Cote sent to then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who is now Pope Benedict XVI.
Another letter to Ratzinger without a response?
1 posted on
05/21/2010 9:19:42 AM PDT by
TSgt
To: TSgt
Yawn.
Everytime I hear a story like this, later I hear the other side, and the Pope is cleared.
But the antiCatholics will keep trying.
2 posted on
05/21/2010 9:27:43 AM PDT by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Quix; 1000 silverlings; metmom; sabe@q.com
For the Ratzinger letter, it says the communication is privileged because it is an attorney work product, is material prepared in anticipation of litigation and is protected by the First Amendment and the Connecticut Constitution.
Attorney work product to Ratzinger? I find the church's claim that Bishops are not employed by the church interesting if they are reaching out to the Vatican, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, for legal matters.
3 posted on
05/21/2010 9:34:20 AM PDT by
TSgt
(We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
To: TSgt
You get diddled as a kid?
9 posted on
05/21/2010 10:43:46 AM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: TSgt
More slanderous assumptions posted by FR's foremost Catholic-hater. As a result...
As a faithful Catholic, I am placing this thread on
IGNORE
If you are Catholic, be aware that this thread contains slanders about the Catholic Church. We should not reward invincibly ignorant anti-Catholic bigots by engaging them in futile debate. Therefore, please do not respond to any of the lies about the Catholic Church contained on this thread.
Saint Paul pray for those who hate the Church.19 posted on
05/21/2010 10:58:02 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson