Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBrow
What does 0bama stand to gain from surrendering to Mexico? What was W’s motivation? Clinton’s? Bush I? Then tere is Reagan’s amnesty

The Clinton and Zero it is pretty simple. Bring in a 3rd world population and you have yourself voters looking to DC for money. I think Reagan was fooled with the idea that there would an amnesty in exchange for enforcement which never happened. Bush I was a chamber of commerce Republican who loves illegals for the cheap labor. Bush II bought into the Rovian lie that he should push amnesty to secure the Latino vote.

61 posted on 05/21/2010 11:58:37 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Those all seem pretty shallow, given that almost all the rest of us see a serious threat.

I wonder if the reasons run deeper than that. I don’t think this sort of long-term slow invasion has a historical precedent.


70 posted on 05/21/2010 12:17:06 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson