To: too_cool_for_skool
Stories about weapons generate lots of responses on FR.
Maybe some of you gun experts can comment on this. I'm not any type of expert of this but from what I've have read is there is no perfect type of rifle for our soldiers. A rifle that's ideal for one environment is not necessarily best for all environments. That seems common sense.
The M14 was very heavy and not suited to many environments but seems ideal for Afghanistan. But if my memory serves me correctly, didn't Bill Clinton order large amounts of these weapons destroyed by executive order? It seems I read this somewhere. These weapons were safe and secure in armories on military bases. They were as safe as the gold in Ft. Know. Now we need them for Afghanistan and we don't have enough. Is this correct or am I prematurely senile?
19 posted on
05/22/2010 12:24:04 PM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: truthguy
Ft Know s/b Ft Knox. Lousy keyboard (and typist) and lousy spell check.
26 posted on
05/22/2010 12:32:33 PM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson