Posted on 05/23/2010 9:39:56 AM PDT by em2vn
Both Neo-Liberalism and traditional Islam present unmistakable hallmarks of Fundamentalist thought. (Neo-Liberalism defined here as the early 20th century attempt to hide socialism behind the term “liberalism.”) Arguably, the main fixation behind both ideologies is controlling others, seeing to it they obey all the rules. In other words, both have a predilection towards totalitarianism. This is clearly seen in regimes like Saudi Arabia, China, Afghanistan and the Soviet Union. Both socialists and Islamic fundamentalists assume a judgmental, condescending tone when preaching. Such doctrinaire attitudes result from accepting a false fundamentalist world view
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
There is a non-intuitiveness to the cozy relationship between Islam and Liberalism. One would think that differences on issues like Gay and Women’s rights would cause them forever at odds. But....many liberals no doubt admire (even salivate over) the power the Mullahs have over their flocks. After all, if one can convince someone to be a suicide bomber, convincing them to pay higher taxes is a piece of cake.
...see David Horowitz’s “Unholy Alliance” where he discusses the simpatico relationship between the Academy and Islam...the professoriat at colleges and universities is AlQueda’s best friend.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend...
They are both outward manifestations of evil. The mask is off.
True but when the muzzies take over they are the first to get taken out.
bttt
Amazing,TY for posting this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.