We eat organic whenever possible (without a doubt, it tastes better). We also drink raw cow’s milk, which is outstanding; I never knew milk tasted *that* good. Chemicals are rarely a positive.
posted on 05/24/2010 4:34:57 PM PDT
("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
Yeah, and you probably prefer natural asbestos insulation over fiberglass insulation. After all, asbestos truly is a natural fiber and does a better job of insulating and you can just ignore that mesothelioma nonsense.
We also drink raw cows milk, which is outstanding; I never knew milk tasted *that* good. Chemicals are rarely a positive.
Chemicals? What does pasteurization have to do with chemicals? If chemicals are a negative, are pathogens like salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, Brucella species, Campylobacter jejuni, and so on, considered a positive?
posted on 05/24/2010 7:52:40 PM PDT
(Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
To: mlizzy; NormsRevenge
Chemicals are rarely a positive.
Food is the smiley face label placed on an assemblage of chemicals, most of which, in sufficient quantity, would kill you.
posted on 05/24/2010 9:31:59 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson