Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Byrne Sues Florida Gov. Charlie Crist For $1 Million
billboard.com ^ | May 24, 2010 | Gary Graff

Posted on 05/24/2010 7:04:28 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

David Byrne is suing the governor of Florida, alleging that he used the Talking Heads' 1985 single "Road to Nowhere" without permission or proper licenses.

Byrne is seeking $1 million in damages from Gov. Charlie Crist, who's also Florida's former Attorney General, and his senatorial campaign for use of the song earlier this year in a website and YouTube ad attacking his then-Republican primary opponent, Marco Rubio. Crist has since changed his campaign and is running as an independent candidate.

The suit (Case Number 8:10-CV1187-T26 (MAP)) was filed early Monday afternoon in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa.

Byrne tells Billboard.com that he became aware of the Crist ad from a friend in New York, where the Talking Heads co-founder resides. "I was pretty upset by that," says Byrne, who had Warner Bros. Records contact the Crist campaign, which subsequently stopped using the ad. But, Byrne contends, "in my opinion the damage had already been done by it being out there. People that I knew had seen (the ad), so it had gotten around. The suit, he adds, "is not about politics...It's about copyright and about the fact that it does imply that I would have licensed it and endorsed him and whatever he stands for."

(Excerpt) Read more at billboard.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2010electionbias; charliecrist; copyrightlaw; crist; davidbyrne; judascrist; pravdamedia; rino; talkingheads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Free ThinkerNY

“is not about politics...It’s about copyright and about the fact that it does imply that I would have licensed it and endorsed him and whatever he stands for.”

STFU Art boY


41 posted on 05/26/2010 4:25:23 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions: $1 Halfbaked: 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

LoL! Very Witty!


42 posted on 05/26/2010 4:28:40 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions: $1 Halfbaked: 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Remain in Court.


43 posted on 05/27/2010 12:19:35 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
You may ask yourself, why the permanent suntan? You may find yourself, despised by your friends after you took their money and switched parties...

My Freshman religion teacher looked like David Byrne, and would often quote him.

44 posted on 06/02/2010 7:17:56 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

And you may ask yourself, why do my cds all end up in the bargain bin?


45 posted on 06/02/2010 7:20:09 AM PDT by sand lake bar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Rap killed the other music genres on MTV in the late 80’s-early 90’s.

Some knuckleheads complained that MTV wasn’t playing enough black music, and you know very well just how potent the race card is. MTV caved.

I used to love watching MTV in its early days, but when they switched the majority of their videos to rap, that was the end for me.


46 posted on 06/02/2010 7:23:35 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Never trust anyone who points their rear end at God while praying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

While rap was a dead end street, it had something that the rest of pop music lacked—no association with the big record labels.

One of the worst ideas of the suicidally bad ideas produced by the RIAA was that MTV should pay huge royalties for the privilege of showing music videos that were commercials for the RIAA.

This fits right in with the RIAA business paradigm that the record companies should get all the money from music, at zero cost to them. None for the artists, none for the print media, TV or radio stations. The RIAA wants every dime.

For years they had included a contract clause in music contracts that the composers and artists were nothing more than “fee for hire”, so deserved no royalties of any kind. Essentially minimum wage slobs. But they had not enforced that clause. So they got congress to pass a special bill to insure that no artist had any claim to anything, that the record company didn’t freely give them. That the clause was still good.

Now they are pushing congress to pass a law that radio stations can’t air their music without paying huge royalties as well. On top of that, that anyone airing music, even public domain music, should be assumed to be airing copyrighted music, and have to pay royalties for it, unless they could prove that the music was public domain after the fact.

They also want to overturn the old ruling that cassette and VHS recording of copyright material for personal use should be legal. That all music is essentially their property.

Holy heck. I don’t think that even demons in Hell could be that insanely greedy.


47 posted on 06/02/2010 9:11:02 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson