I did, and still think it sets a bad precedent. Where does one draw the line between 'mental incapacity' and 'mental competence'? Many would argue (incorrectly) that merely refusing medical treatment is proof enough of mental incompetence.
My Grandmother was diagnosed with cancer twice in mid-life. She recovered through prayer. She finally did develop cancer a third time and died of it - at the age of 91! (with medical treatment)
I agree with both of you it is a very difficult situation, that is why there is the controversy.
“...because the woman, who has learning difficulties, was deemed incapable of making a rational decision about the operation.”
“Learning difficulties,” seems way down the scale of mental incapacity or competence.
On the other hand, thank goodness there is absolutely no profit motive involved in this decision as neither the doctors or the hospital will benefit in any way whatsoever.
If they had complied with her change of mind I am sure many would be claiming ‘death panels’ - so perhaps getting the judicial ruling is the best form of protection for all concerned from future problems.