Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too
Who's to say that one reason over another is legal or not legal?

The U.S. Code?

Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Let me pull out the verbiage that puts the quid pro quo of an unannounced candidate into the legal hopper:

Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any... position... provided for... by any Act of Congress... to any person as... reward... in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office

Promising a reward to a person, in the form of a Federal job, for them not to run is a violation of this particular law.

14 posted on 05/27/2010 8:30:54 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Let me reparse it for you. You missed a key phrase.

Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any... position... provided for... by any Act of Congress... to any person as... reward for any political activity... in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office

The parsing you cited as "reward... in connection with any primary election" could refer to paying people for "get out the vote" activities. That "reward" is the quid, but what is the "quo?" The "quo" is not any activity relating to an election.

I'm saying that the "quo" is "any political activity," but not a "political inactivity." You cannot criminalize not running. You can criminalize running and then taking a "reward" to stop running.

-PJ

15 posted on 05/27/2010 9:12:40 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson