Society to review climate message

BBC ^ | May 27, 2010 | Roger Harrabin, "Environment Analyst"

[Labour-Watch]

The UK's Royal Society is reviewing its public statements on climate change after 43 Fellows complained that it had oversimplified its messages.

They said the communications did not properly distinguish between what was widely agreed on climate science and what is not fully understood.

[Labour-Watch]

The real scientific "consensus" might not be in agreement with Al Gore after all.

[jessduntno]

They said the communications did not properly distinguish between what was widely agreed on climate science and what is not fully understood.”

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

[dila813]

They don’t want to go down in history with an over the top lie. They would like there organization to have a little more prestige 100 years from now.

[Publius6961]

They said the communications did not properly distinguish between what was widely agreed on climate science and what is not fully understood.

As scientists, they were ethically obligated to do exactly that.

EPIC FAIL

Other than the fact that they are about 20 years too late...

[cpdiii]

It is absolutely ludicrous to try and forecast Global Warming when science can not tell us what started the last ice age nor can they tell us what ended it.

Global warming is a political movement, not true science.

[kroll]

Hang on there....Global Warming isn’t science but it has nothing to do with the last ice age or whatever - that makes no sense. Its because of a) they don’t have enough data to show warming due to CO2, b) the models (essentially the theory) are very far from being accurate and conclusions drawn from them (a la IPCC) are specious.