Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: Rich 'Not Paying Their Fair Share' in Taxes ("Brazil should be our example")
Fox News ^ | 05/28/2010

Posted on 05/28/2010 8:12:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The rich are not being taxed enough and the economy is suffering for it, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday.

The former first lady broached the subject during a national security discussion at the Brookings Institution. She lamented that the United States has lowered taxes on the wealthy and said nations around the world need to "increase their public revenue collections" to spur investment.

"The rich are not paying their fair share in any nation that is facing the kind of employment issues (the United States is), whether it's individual, corporate, whatever the taxation forms are," she said.

Clinton pointed to Brazil's high taxation as an example that other countries should strive toward.

"Brazil has the highest tax-to-GDP rate in the Western Hemisphere and guess what -- it's growing like crazy. And the rich are getting richer, but they're pulling people out of poverty," she said. "There is a certain formula there that used to work for us until we abandoned it, to our regret in my opinion."

Clinton cautioned that she was not speaking for the Obama administration as a whole.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fairshare; hillaryclinton; hrc; rich; spreadthewealth; taxes; taxincreases
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Is EVERYONE in the entire Demoncrap Party STARK, STARING insane????


41 posted on 05/28/2010 8:59:47 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is why I can’t understand why some people on the right think hillary would have been better than obama. They both support the same leftist policies.


42 posted on 05/28/2010 9:03:11 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
This is why I can’t understand why some people on the right think hillary would have been better than obama

Let's not use the word "better". Let's use the word "less disastrous". People on the right were hoping that some of Bill's practicality and inclination to listen to advisers like Dick Morris ( e.g., giving up part of his agenda to the GOP Congress, like Welfare reform and cutting capital gains tax ) would have rubbed off Hillary a little.

Between two Democrats, the choice really is between the lesser of two evils.
43 posted on 05/28/2010 9:06:00 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

A house divided against itself cannot long stand.

Time to throw all the damn liberals in the Marianas Trench.


44 posted on 05/28/2010 9:06:50 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
This is why I can’t understand why some people on the right think hillary would have been better than obama. They both support the same leftist policies.

Hillary is an Alinskyite and globalist
This administration is full of Clinton admin. people.

45 posted on 05/28/2010 9:16:01 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

And the democrats will install a lot more taxes in 1/2011.


46 posted on 05/28/2010 9:18:57 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: clee1

Conclusions often appear to be insane to someone else with a different worldview because those “insane” conclusions are based on a completely different premise or worldview.

Theirs happens to be WRONG, and based on infernal deceptions, but their conclusions are completely “sane” when you start from the same basis.


47 posted on 05/28/2010 9:21:07 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
This, from the former first lady of Arkansas, who once donated Slick’s uses boxers to charity, claiming 50 cents a pair as fair market value on their tax return

Make that $2 a pair.

48 posted on 05/28/2010 9:28:05 AM PDT by farmguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hillary, be my guest. There isn’t any law prohibiting you from donating $100 million to the US Treasury.


49 posted on 05/28/2010 9:32:53 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The highest marginal income tax rate in Brazil is 27.5%, capital gains are taxed at 15%, dividends from domestic corporations are tax free. The corporate tax rate is 24% to 34%, depending on the surcharges.


50 posted on 05/28/2010 9:34:41 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monocle
There isn’t any law prohibiting you from donating $100 million to the US Treasury.

to Shrillary, voluntary donations don't count. It has to be forcibly taken under threat of fines or jail for it to count as "PAYING" your fair share.
51 posted on 05/28/2010 9:35:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
The highest marginal income tax rate in Brazil is 27.5%, capital gains are taxed at 15%, dividends from domestic corporations are tax free. The corporate tax rate is 24% to 34%, depending on the surcharges.

Looks like these folks are taxed at a lower rate than us in our once great country. I don't think Hillary is refering to these tax rates though...
52 posted on 05/28/2010 9:36:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Labyrinthos

So, low tax rates, and energy independence.

Maybe she’s on to something.


53 posted on 05/28/2010 9:38:49 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: marron
Maybe she’s on to something.

Someone ought to confront her with these facts and make her spill out EXACTLY what she means when she refers to Brazil.
54 posted on 05/28/2010 9:40:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

need to “increase their public revenue collections” to spur investment.

the same “Invest in America” cr@p her husband’s administration was out there trying to sell


55 posted on 05/28/2010 9:53:40 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I agree. Brazil should be our model. Down there, the tax rates are sky-high, but NO ONE PAYS THEIR TAXES.


56 posted on 05/28/2010 10:03:36 AM PDT by karnage (worn arguments and old attitudes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
nations around the world need to "increase their public revenue collections"

and who cares about pesky issues of violations of natural rights to liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness.

57 posted on 05/28/2010 10:04:00 AM PDT by mjp (pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, independence, limited government, capitalism})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1

“Is EVERYONE in the entire Demoncrap Party STARK, STARING insane????”

In a word— YES!


58 posted on 05/28/2010 10:15:18 AM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Great pic! I can just hear him say that.


59 posted on 05/28/2010 10:15:35 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

“...Brazil may look good to Hillary, but there are huge shanty towns in the major cities where thousands still live in squalor.”

If those shanty towns were here in the USA, many of the inhabitants of said shanty town would still be voiting for Democrats.


60 posted on 05/28/2010 10:17:10 AM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson