Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett

“Even on table-top runways which are basically built atop flattened hills?”

Yep. All the decision height does is keep the plane out of harm’s way IF the crew does not have sufficient visual contact with the airport to land the plane.

From the other comments here, it sounds like the captain was fixated on landing the plane, in spite of it being too high, too fast, or both. And for some reason, he wasn’t accepting any situational input from his copilot.

Sad.


15 posted on 05/30/2010 7:41:08 PM PDT by Tigerized (pursuingliberty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Tigerized

Thanks for the details. I appreciate it.


16 posted on 05/30/2010 9:00:21 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Tigerized
From the other comments here, it sounds like the captain was fixated on landing the plane, in spite of it being too high, too fast, or both.

We in the flying community call that "get-there-itis". Killed a lot of people over the years. Of course commercial carriers are under a great deal of pressure (much of that coming from the flying public) to be "on time/on schedule". Go-arounds cost time and money...if you magically make it you are a hero...but when you don't....

17 posted on 05/30/2010 9:08:55 PM PDT by Niteflyr ("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson