Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Legalization of pot favored
Orance County Register ^ | 6/1/2010 | Martin Wisckol

Posted on 06/01/2010 10:18:18 AM PDT by South40

California voters favor the legalization of marijuana for personal use 49 percent to 41 percent, according to a LA Times/USC poll. The measure will appear on the November ballot.

However, one-third of backers say they favor it only “somewhat.”

A poll last month by the Public Policy Institute of California found the measure in a statistical dead heat, 49 percent to 48 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: commerceclause; tenthamendment; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: South40

Won’t matter what they legalize, The fed’s and dea will come in and close down shops anyway (while the Sheriff’s stand idly by not knowing one iota of their powers). CA has no teeth because its too much on the gov’t teet.


21 posted on 06/01/2010 10:36:36 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

Drugs have never improved a society or individual.

On a side note: the “legalize, regulate and tax” movement is a bit of an enigma. On one hand people contend that they have a right to do drugs and what they put in their body is their business. I am not taking a position on that.

On the other hand, they are begging for the the regulation and taxation of that right. I have a big problem with any rights being regulated and taxed.


22 posted on 06/01/2010 10:38:39 AM PDT by Dayman (My 1919a4 is named Charlotte. When I light her up she has the voice of an angel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
Pot prohibition has failed just like alcohol prohibition and socialism failed.

All three refuse to take human nature into account.
23 posted on 06/01/2010 10:45:06 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

“Won’t matter what they legalize, The fed’s and dea will come in and close down shops anyway (while the Sheriff’s stand idly by not knowing one iota of their powers). CA has no teeth because its too much on the gov’t teet.”

Has our sterling Imperial Federal government performed any such raids in CA? They dont control the borders so why control mind rotting drugs?


24 posted on 06/01/2010 10:46:56 AM PDT by texson66 (Congress does not draw to its halls those who love liberty. It draws those who love power .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I don’t think their brains could be damaged any more than they are, so why not?


25 posted on 06/01/2010 10:49:29 AM PDT by fwdude (It is not the liberals who will destroy this country, but the "moderates.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dayman
Drugs have never improved a society or individual.

I agree! Let's ban ALL drugs, starting with aspirin.

26 posted on 06/01/2010 10:50:42 AM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Governement should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: South40

Why would any company want to open a facility in a high tax state where your employees are either illegal or high? Yeah this is going to be great for the California economy.


27 posted on 06/01/2010 10:56:34 AM PDT by dblshot (Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texson66

Yes, they have. Several as a matter of fact.


28 posted on 06/01/2010 10:57:56 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

I’m not in favor of governmental bans on much of anything. I just don’t favor the use of narcotics or think it has any redeaming value for most people.

You have touched on something that is also very true, many prescription and non-prescription drugs are very harmful. People really can do a lot of damage by over using them.


29 posted on 06/01/2010 10:58:43 AM PDT by Dayman (My 1919a4 is named Charlotte. When I light her up she has the voice of an angel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LottieDah

:-)


30 posted on 06/01/2010 11:07:28 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
As opposed to your state where employees are drunk?
31 posted on 06/01/2010 11:11:03 AM PDT by starlifter (Sapor Amo Pullus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: South40
Rasmussen got the same result. Surveys done in May¹, July and November² showed that support rose from 45% to 47% to 49%, while opposition fell from 46% to 42% to 38%:

______________________________________

05-12-2009:

45% Support
46% Oppose
9% Undecided

______________________________________

07-24-2009:

47% support
42% oppose
11% undecided

______________________________________

11-22-2009:

49% support
38% oppose
12% undecided

______________________________________

¹http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_state_surveys/california/toplines/toplines_california_budget_crisis_may_12_2009

²http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_state_surveys/california/49_in_california_favor_legalizing_taxing_pot

32 posted on 06/01/2010 11:16:02 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
Won't matter what they legalize, The fed's and dea will come in and close down shops anyway (while the Sheriff's stand idly by not knowing one iota of their powers). CA has no teeth because its too much on the gov't teet.

Do you think CA should have the prerogative to carry out such a policy under the Tenth Amendment? Or, do you think fedgov should try to shut it down under authority of the Commerce Clause?

33 posted on 06/01/2010 11:32:34 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: South40

I say why not make it legal. People shouldn’t have their lives ruined or be thrown in jail because of marijuana.

It would save taxpayers a boat load of money if the states and Feds didn’t tie up so many resources chasing this will-o-the-wisp. And it would save our freedoms if we couldn’t be busted for every little thing big daddy government doesn’t approve of.

As far as I’m concerned marijuana is in the same class as cigarettes and booze.


34 posted on 06/01/2010 11:35:03 AM PDT by kamikaze2000 (You can lead a liberal to truth, but you can't make him think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson