Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EBH
All of the environmental training I get from my corporation states that:

1. All federal laws will be complied with.
2. Any state laws that are more stringent than the federal laws will be complied with.
3. Any corporate policies that are more stringent than the state laws will be complied with.

So for quite some time it seems that states can regulate in certain areas, but only if they are more stringent than the federal government.

This may not be right, but it is not new.

27 posted on 06/02/2010 6:06:14 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (These fragments I have shored against my ruins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

This EPA business has Obama’s fingerprints all over it. Pure and simple, Obama’s targeting Texas for it’s support of Republicans.

This program that the EPA is going after was started by Ann Richards (D) when she was Governor. The EPA never had a problem with it, until now. This is a purely political move and has nothing to do with the Clean Air Act.


28 posted on 06/02/2010 6:15:21 PM PDT by unbiasedtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

That is correct, but this is the first time the Fed. EPA has taken over a State program.

Texas needs to make them prove the allegations of insufficiency.

The danger in this move by the Fed. EPA is that it can deem ANY state agency insufficient.

The Fed. needs to show where the Texas Air Pollution Regulations don’t at least meet Fed. requirements.


32 posted on 06/03/2010 3:44:15 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson