Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

Reports are that firearms were thrown overboard:
http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=177475

And I object to your phrasing:”why was it that IDF forces had guns to kill a bunch of passengers but no passenger, on a boat Israel thought had arms, had a gun to shoot the IDF?”

Hmmm, the Israelis had guns to protect the Israeli troops;they didn’t board with the intention of killing folks. If the Israelis had wanted to kill the passengers, the Israelis could have (1) ordered an air attack; (2) planted a mine under the ship (3) blasted the ship out of the water in other ways. All of THOSE actions wouldn’t have resulted in any injuries to their own troops. As this article indicates, by an AlJazeera cameraman, the Israelis did NOT fire until some of their troops were overpowered and taken below deck.


13 posted on 06/04/2010 6:27:13 AM PDT by JoyjoyfromNJ (Psalm 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: JoyjoyfromNJ

Unfortunately, if a boarded ship throws all of its arms overboard and never used them (the only guns ever fired were IDF guns, according to the JP), then it looks like the passengers were merely being civil and didn’t want to kill while IDF soldiers went on a killing spree.


15 posted on 06/04/2010 6:33:09 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson