scroll back, Schiff invests solely outside of America with America’s economic competitors ONLY
that puts Americans out of work.
Schiff did not create the environment where the comparative advantage for USA based capital can find better total returns investing in foreign economies.
Schiff does not have a claim of entitlement to advise and invest his clients’ capital, he is but a conduit of the capital seeking the optimal income return based on the clients’ investment decisions.
If Schiff did not exist as a capital investment advisor, the capital he has under management now would still be investing outside the United States.
Schiff has been consistently promoting macroeconomic policy changes that would promote a return to competitiveness for domestic capital investment, and amongst the primary candidates, is the only one with a knowledgeable and coherent economic policy position. The others do not even understand the fundamentals of what they are stumping about on the campaign trail, let alone being able to wrestle with the larger complexities in altering US labor, economic and taxation policies and associated lobbies to promote US domestic growth.
As a final note, this is all a friendly convo, we’ve been here many years and I’ll explicitly say I respect the advocacy you’ve put your heart into over the years,
and even as I agree with you about Kokesh, Schiff himself has been a good advocate inside the scope of the Ct. Rep primary, as he appeals to the monied classes that fill the voting booths in Ct. Rep primaries...