Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
The North wanted to end slavery.

The South wanted to count all slaves as full votes for purposes of apportionment of the representatives. Doing so, they would be permitted more Representatives.

By holding that vote to 3/5, it empowered the North to have a greater apportionment of representatives that would be anti-slavery.

In the context of the time, the 3/5 provision was a victory for anti-slavery forces.

However, looked at with no context, it looks like slaves were not valued as people.

This was a political tactic by the northern colonies to try to obtain a greater share of power in Congress.

26 posted on 06/09/2010 8:37:30 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: LachlanMinnesota

Too bad the North was all slave, except MA, at the time of the Constitution passage.


31 posted on 06/09/2010 9:48:53 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson