Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/09/2010 7:46:49 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam

Why aren’t the two major political parties on that list?

;-)


2 posted on 06/09/2010 7:50:17 AM PDT by WayneS ("1984" was a WARNING, not an Instruction Manual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I remeber years ago when I worked for Western Union, my supervisor tried to get me to donate some of my paycheck to The United Way. I told her no, that I give to my church and I am happy enough with that. A lot of these big charities have a lot of bureaucratic expenses. Fogettabouddit!


3 posted on 06/09/2010 7:51:00 AM PDT by brooklyn dave (this is a NO-BAMA zone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
How come Barbra Streisand's charity didn't make the list? I thought it had administrative expenses at almost 90%.
4 posted on 06/09/2010 7:52:32 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
"Please Touch Museum...targets children ages seven and below using play as an educational tool."

Er.

Actually, I would put the entire United Way as number 1. Just because so many of them are annoying jerks and liars.

6 posted on 06/09/2010 7:55:52 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Willie Green
The 20 Worst Charities In America

# 1. ----------- The Department of Revenue

(... or is that theft?)

7 posted on 06/09/2010 7:58:02 AM PDT by ICAB9USA (I lost part of my middle finger .......... it almost rendered me mute. -- Rahm Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The Bill Clinton Double-Wide Presidential Library and XXX Porno Shop must have been retired as "Charity Rip-Off Emeritus."
10 posted on 06/09/2010 8:01:44 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Federal Government
Administrative Expenses: 128.00%


17 posted on 06/09/2010 8:17:39 AM PDT by maddog55 (OBAMA, Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Are administrative expenses always a bad thing? If I give a dollar to a charity and they pay it to a fundraiser who gets two dollars from someone else, that would seem to be a good thing. My charity dollars are being multiplied.

Also, one would expect certain kinds of charities would have high administrative expenses. For example, Make-A-Wish foundation has high administrative expenses, but every recipient of their charity gets something a little different. If a charity is giving every child with a terminal illness the same teddy bear, it would be easy to keep administrative expenses low. But if this child wants to go to Disney World and that child wants to go to the Super Bowl, it seems like it would require a larger staff to make sure everything was done properly.


19 posted on 06/09/2010 8:21:39 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

My donations usually go to Salvation Army and Disabled American Veterans.


25 posted on 06/09/2010 8:36:03 AM PDT by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

20. Tucson Audubon Society - Administrative expenses: 42.8%
19. New Hampshire Audubon - Administrative expenses: 42.8%
18. Gospel to the Unreached Millions (GUM) - Administrative expenses: 43.1%
17. American Psychiatric Foundation - Administrative expenses: 43.7%
16. Marshall Heights Community Development Organization (MHCDO) - Administrative expenses: 44.1%
15. Please Touch Museum - Administrative expenses: 44.9%
14. American Friends of the Open University of Israel (AFOUI) - Administrative expenses: 45.2%
13. Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics - Administrative expenses: 45.4%
12. Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens - Administrative expenses: 45.8%
11. Victorious Christian Living International - Administrative expenses: 46.0%
10. Center for Individual Rights - Administrative expenses: 46.1%
9. Changed Lives - Administrative expenses: 47.4%
8. Vision New England - Administrative expenses: 48.7%
7. Charleston Area Medical Center Foundation (CAMCF) - Administrative expenses: 48.8%
6. National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame - Administrative expenses: 55.1%
5. Cherokee National Historical Society - Administrative expenses: 58.2%
4. Union Rescue Mission, Little Rock - Administrative expenses: 62.1%
3. National Council of Negro Women (NCNW) - Administrative expenses: 64%
2. Boys Choir of Harlem - Administrative expenses: 66.3%
1. American Tract Society - Administrative expenses: 68.0%

Where do MADD and United Way measure up these days?


26 posted on 06/09/2010 8:38:23 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Too many of those on the list are “Christian” organizations. This is disturbing, time to clean out the closet.


28 posted on 06/09/2010 8:42:24 AM PDT by ican'tbelieveit (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team# 36120), KW:Folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The Audubon Society is nothing but an arm of the DNC. They opened my eyes back in 2000 when their magazine extolled the virtues of the Democrats over the evil George Bush. I stopped my membership right then and haven't’ given them a fig since. The Audubon Society can burn in Hell IMO.
38 posted on 06/09/2010 9:19:20 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I think the worst charity is the Susan G. Komen Foundation which collects money for a pro-life cause, breast-cancer research, and then diverts some of that money to the anti-life Planned Parenthood.
That’s bait-and-switch.


39 posted on 06/09/2010 9:47:54 AM PDT by namvolunteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

ACLU, NOW, Planned Parenthood, Rainbow Coalition, HRC, etc, etc.


40 posted on 06/09/2010 10:00:41 AM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

HUSUS and Peta should be on the list.

Unless you want to count executing pets as providing a direct benefit.


44 posted on 06/09/2010 2:48:39 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Liberals are educated above their level of intelligence.. Thanks Sr. Angelica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson