Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eurotwit

Not so great news:

The Christian Democrats, the “Republicans” of the Netherlands lost nearly half of their votes, from 40 to 21. Wilders’ party is anti-Islamicist, but has also been socialistic, pro-gay, pro-abortion, pro-drug. (It’s sort of as if Wilders figured out that Muslims kill gays.)


6 posted on 06/10/2010 5:22:04 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

(Hopefully, the CDA will wake up and start fishing for Wilders’ supporters’ votes.)


7 posted on 06/10/2010 5:22:39 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

You can take the European out of Europe, but you can’t take the Europe out of the European............


9 posted on 06/10/2010 5:24:26 AM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

That’s why I find the results interesting. The CDA are the sort of “republicans” that have largely helped create the tea party phenomenon. They ruled with the socialists in labour for goodness sake.

You also are less than truthful when it comes to Wilder’s economic agenda. Wilders want to lower taxes and remove government regulations. Yeah, he might be more libertarian when it comes to social issues than some freepers, sure...and he wants to keep the retirement age as is.

That is where Rutte’s strong showing come in. People in Rutte’s party where sceptical about cooperating with Wilders - not because of his anti islamic immigration agenda, but due to the issues of rising the retirement age.

In any coalition, Wilders would have to give that up. I.e. move the the right on some of these economic issues whilst retaining the stance against islamism.

However, getting a working coalition out of this requires more than Rutte and Wilders and is going to be very very difficult.


14 posted on 06/10/2010 5:33:09 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

FYI. Wilders’ socialistic party platform:

The Party for Freedom combines economic liberalism with a conservative programme towards immigration and culture. The party seeks tax cuts (€16 billion in the 2006 election programme), de-centralization, abolition of the minimum wage, and limiting child benefits and government subsidies. Regarding immigration and culture, the party believes that the Judeo-Christian and humanist traditions should be treated as the dominant culture in the Netherlands, and that immigrants should adapt accordingly. The party wants a halt to immigration from non-western countries. It is skeptical towards the EU, is against future EU enlargement with countries like Turkey and opposes a dominant presence of Islam in the Netherlands.[21] The party is also opposed to dual citizenship (see below).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_for_Freedom#Political_issues


16 posted on 06/10/2010 5:35:38 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

Baby steps.


29 posted on 06/10/2010 6:56:11 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
The Christian Democrats, the “Republicans” of the Netherlands lost nearly half of their votes, from 40 to 21. Wilders’ party is anti-Islamicist, but has also been socialistic, pro-gay, pro-abortion, pro-drug. (It’s sort of as if Wilders figured out that Muslims kill gays.)

Sounds like a message has been sent to the Christian Democrats: copy Wilders' anti-Islamicist plank, or disappear from the political scene.

30 posted on 06/10/2010 7:01:33 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson