Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ethics Rules "Byte" Obama White House (Violations of Presidential Records Act and Ethics Rules)
Daily Caller ^ | 6/11/2010 | Jonathan Strong

Posted on 06/13/2010 3:19:17 PM PDT by Qbert

When the administration slapped the wrist of one of its top technology officials this spring for violating Barack Obama’s ethics pledge, a spokesman claimed the breaches were isolated incidents.

But a Daily Caller investigation reveals a cavalier attitude at the Obama White House toward longstanding safeguards designed to prevent abuses of the Presidential Records Act and other laws – including acts that carry serious legal implications.

Two sources say a top White House technology official, Chief Information Officer Brook Colangelo, routinely asked technology vendors for special deals based on his position as a public official.

“I heard the CIO talking to various technology vendors, saying … like, ‘You should give this to us for free because we’re the White House.’ And he actually said that to people,” one source said. A second source said Colangelo continued the practice even after having been confronted about its appropriateness.

Asking for discounts as a White House political official violates ethical rules and potentially federal law, experts say.

[Snip]

Much of the information obtained by The Daily Caller comes from the first few months of the administration, when the technologically savvy culture of the Obama campaign collided with the restrictive rules of the White House.

[Snip]

Specifically, the Presidential Records Act requires the White House to archive most written communications. The intent of the law, enacted in the wake of the Nixon Watergate scandal, was two-fold: to preserve the documents for historians and record potential ethical and legal violations.

E-mails sent from official White House accounts are preserved. But those sent from a personal account would bypass the system – in violation of the law, depending on the circumstances.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corruption; ethics; issa; obama; transparency
...Sestak, Romanoff, Broken laws and ethics rules, etc., etc....and these are the people that came into town promising to sweep out the Culture of Corruption. Time to Drain the Swamp...
1 posted on 06/13/2010 3:19:17 PM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Well, if it doesn’t get reported by a real “impartial and reliable” news source like MSNBC then it doesn’t count... and never happened.


2 posted on 06/13/2010 3:24:02 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

isolated incidents.


3 posted on 06/13/2010 3:25:49 PM PDT by muddler (Obama is either incompetent or malicious, and it makes little difference which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Two sources say a top White House technology official, Chief Information Officer Brook Colangelo, routinely asked technology vendors for special deals based on his position as a public official.

The Chicago Way gone national. "You wouldn't want nothing to happen to your business, would ya?"

4 posted on 06/13/2010 3:27:38 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Specifically, the Presidential Records Act requires the White House to archive most written communications. The intent of the law, enacted in the wake of the Nixon Watergate scandal, was two-fold: to preserve the documents for historians and record potential ethical and legal violations.


What does Hillary know, and how long has she known it?
Possibly long enough to be liable for complicity? Is she ready to turn for immunity of states yet?

5 posted on 06/13/2010 3:29:28 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:31 Behold, I am against you, O you most proud, said the Lord God of hosts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

If the sun came up today...

...the Obama admin committed another ethics violation.


6 posted on 06/13/2010 3:29:56 PM PDT by moovova (More coffee please...make it a double.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

They did sweep out the old Culture of Corruption and introduced the new and improved Full-Strength Culture of Corruption.


7 posted on 06/13/2010 3:32:17 PM PDT by hometoroost (Proverbs 8:36 - All those who hate me love death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

Filling up the swamp.


8 posted on 06/13/2010 3:34:26 PM PDT by MaxMax (Conservatism isn't a party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

They want to run the White House just like they ran Chicago.


9 posted on 06/13/2010 3:41:06 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

They want to run the White House just like they ran Chicago.


10 posted on 06/13/2010 3:41:06 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Pelosi signed his certification to run in Hawaii


11 posted on 06/13/2010 4:02:53 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

lol how about discounts on clebrity parties.


12 posted on 06/13/2010 4:04:02 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

‘And, on the issue of Colangelo seeking special deals, the first White House official offered a longer, carefully worded defense that denies that practice takes place inside the White House.

Given nearly a week to respond, the official said, “The Office of Administration follows all federal procurement laws in dealing with vendors. As was the case here, it considers only performance when dealing with vendors. The office does not ask for special treatment or deals from vendors; it does work with them to ensure that they can meet the unique and particular technological specifications that are sometimes necessary given the work of the White House.”

Now? Maybe, but I doubt it. But what about in the past? Carefully worded is right!


13 posted on 06/13/2010 4:18:22 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Clearly it's the ethics rules that are broken and not the Obama White House - gotta get a bunch of ethics experts together so that they can tell Obama which ethics rules he needs to kick in the ass...

/s

14 posted on 06/13/2010 4:25:20 PM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
You should give this to us for free because we’re the White House.

Chicago style politics at its finest. Ask anyone who lived there.

15 posted on 06/13/2010 4:54:13 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
They want to run the White House just like they ran Chicago.

Wrong Tense.

They are running the White House like they ran Chicago.

16 posted on 06/13/2010 4:56:13 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson