Posted on 06/17/2010 11:47:45 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
Ted Olson is a disgrace.
The reason for marriage is protection of the procreative unit. It’s such a fundamental, self-evident fact that there is no need to provide “experts.”
It would have been nice if Kennedy would have applied those same libertarian leanings when deciding Kelo. Of course, he didn't.
It is a California Constitutional amendment. How can it be overturned? If it is, then the state constitution means nothing. For the only standard becomes the one the unaccountable judges say it is.
Theodore Olson: off the rails in a big way.
Is it a bad sign when the judge is writing his decision before the final arguments are done?
If this judge rules against 8 and that the government must “treat every citizen equally” then it will be time for those of us that only pay taxes and get no service to sue for our equal rights.
When one citizen gets free food, free school, free medical, free housing, etc
and
one citizen receives nothing.
That is not the government treating equally. Why 10% from one and 50% from another? The entire progressive tax system should be ruled un-Constitutional.
Evidence: Rome
The reason for *Marriage* is to establish *Order* between Men and Women* *A Covenant* * *Legal Contract* *A Commitment* based on children, fidelity and family ties.
A Man and Woman seals that covenant with *Consumation*
Gays cannot consummate nor can they re-produce with one another, nor can they provide a child with a Mother, Father and biological family connections.
Also GAYS can marry, they cannot re-define what marraige is.
Has the SCOTUS weighed in on similar cases? Because it seems this is where it is headed.
The judge needs to show how he is given the authority to overrule the will of the voters over something that is a universal cultural belief (at least until the rise of post-WWII socialism).
Being in the position that he’s in,
and being a liberal,
he inherently “knows better” than the hoi polloi.
At Closings, Judge Asks Same-Sex Marriage Foes, “Where’s Your Evidence?”
They aren't. Liberals called Hillary Clinton a b**** and Sarah Palin a c*** for running in 2008.
Identity politics only means something to the politically correct when you serve the Party.
Making law from the bench is what liberals do best.
Take your little ballot initiative and screw off. America wasn’t made for you little people. Just important Judges and politicians like us. :)
Huh? Is this what we pay unelected judges their fat salaries for? Any HS biology student should know, 2 men can bugger each other till rapture and it won't produce a baby, so marriage between a man and woman is the only way to insure procreation. We need to cite case law for this? God help us.
Sounds like the judge likes Boston Legal too much.
The judge is a queer...who didnt know what the result was going to be months ago?
What a bunch of stupid f*ks.
two men or two women by themselves can not reproduce and create a family.. simple as that.
they can only ‘synthesize’ the experiences and then proclaim it matches or means as much as the man and woman model of a family to satisfy a few. rule of the minority or what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.