Skip to comments.
At Closings, Judge Asks Same-Sex Marriage Foes, "Where's Your Evidence?"
New York Lawyer ^
| June 17, 2010
| By Dan Levine | The Recorder
Posted on 06/17/2010 11:47:45 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: fwdude
There is also the “lore” that when a Judge grills the lawyer it means the judge leans towards the side the lawyer represents.
41
posted on
06/17/2010 2:15:15 PM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Not in this case. The judge is a homosexual. He's been blatantly biased during this entire show "trial". The Prop 8 attorneys are right in the fact that the law is absolutely clear, and the only reason to have a "trial" was so that this filthy disease ridden pervert can stack the record with "evidence" that supports his agenda.
Walker is going to overturn Prop 8.
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
He was the conservatives' hero when he worked on Bush's case in 2000.
Now that he's defending homosexuals, he's a disgrace. Yes, thats right. He was a hero when he was on the right side and now that he's on the wrong side, he's a disgrace.
43
posted on
06/17/2010 3:33:10 PM PDT
by
marron
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I don’t believe he’s “openly” homosexual - this has only been suggested by the homo-media and Walker has never made such a statement to my knowledge. Of course, he probably is.
44
posted on
06/17/2010 3:43:14 PM PDT
by
fwdude
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
There is also the “lore” that when a Judge grills the lawyer it means the judge leans towards the side the lawyer represents. I'm thinking back to the California Supreme Ct. case after Prop 8 passed and was put on trial. Many of the supremes asked some hard questions, and the final outcome was anyone's guess. It turns out that all but one found Prop 8 constitutional. Of course, they threw a bone to the homophiles by letting them keep the "marriages" that had already taken place.
45
posted on
06/17/2010 3:46:55 PM PDT
by
fwdude
To: ModelBreaker
Back when I was practicing law, I had a chance to be heavily involved in the “Boy Scouts have to admit gay boys” case. I passed because it would be bad constitutional law had I won.Obviously, Ted doesn't share your morals. If he did, he would not have taken this case.
46
posted on
06/17/2010 4:07:58 PM PDT
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(People should not be afraid of the government. Governement should be afraid of the people)
To: marron
Yes, thats right. He was a hero when he was on the right side and now that he's on the wrong side, he's a disgrace.True heroes don't check their morals at the door. They stand up for what's right no matter the personal cost.
47
posted on
06/17/2010 4:09:05 PM PDT
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(People should not be afraid of the government. Governement should be afraid of the people)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
What’s the rational basis to ALLOW gay marriage?
48
posted on
06/18/2010 10:42:23 AM PDT
by
Impy
(DROP. OUT. MARK. KIRK.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson