To: mkjessup
So then, based on your post and reasoning, shouldn’t Ron Paul also be guilty by association for endorsing McKinney, Nader and Baldwin? The reason I bring this up is your buddy, rabs, said he would have no problem voting for Ron Paul for President because he agrees with Paul on 80% and disagrees on 20%.
To: rintense; rabscuttle385; stephenjohnbanker
So then, based on your post and reasoning, shouldn’t Ron Paul also be guilty by association for endorsing McKinney, Nader and Baldwin? The reason I bring this up is your buddy, rabs, said he would have no problem voting for Ron Paul for President because he agrees with Paul on 80% and disagrees on 20%.
I don't support Ron Paul under any conditions. You need to ask Rabs about this, not me.
Thanks for contacting the SJB/MKJ/Rabscuttle Motors Customer Service Department.
142 posted on
06/18/2010 1:53:57 PM PDT by
mkjessup
("Press '1' for English, if you don't speak English, GTF off the phone!")
To: rintense
shouldn’t Ron Paul also be guilty by association for endorsing McKinney, Nader and Baldwin? Endorse? When did he do that?
162 posted on
06/18/2010 3:04:19 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
("California just got the best politicians money can buy." -- AuntB)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson