Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gulf Oil Full Of Methane, Adding New Concerns
Associated Press ^ | June 18, 2010 | MATTHEW BROWN and RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTI

Posted on 06/18/2010 5:41:00 AM PDT by numberonepal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last
To: Jedidah

Nope. Zero chance of an explosion.

The pressure could somehow fracture/rupture the seabed allowing a sudden release of huge volumes of gas. THAT however, COULD happen, and has been postulated (not by tin foil types) to have caused sudden ship sinkings, as the huge bubble cloud of gas reaches the surface of the ocean, suddenly reducing the density of the sea, swallowing ships in seconds. While never detected, that has been written up and accepted as plausible. It’s even a theory of how the Bermuda Triangle swallows ships.

But seriously, put your worry stone away on this one.


61 posted on 06/18/2010 7:38:14 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Thanks for the reassurance. ;-)


62 posted on 06/18/2010 7:41:58 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Seeming like many are going about 150 miles to the right of Ron Paul.

Maybe forums are supposed to be by people who haven’t a clue about what they post. Along the lines of everyone with a video cam and U-tube.


63 posted on 06/18/2010 7:44:05 AM PDT by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

autumn —

Turn the gush down just a bit ;-)

Hydrogen Sulfide, H2S is pretty much a biocide for all organismic that breathe oxygen. In other words, Hydrogen Sulfide *IS* a powerful poison to dinosaurs and humans. It is likely *one* of the causes of the VERY sudden death of the people in Pompeii, along with heat and suffocation.

The other poster wrote about “low levels” of H2S. H2S is a bad gas and is toxic/harmful in fairly low concentrations, much like Cyanide gas.

But fear not, just cuz you can smell it doesn’t mean you will die.

LOTS of land-based wells in Texas and Louisiana are posted with poison gas signs because the wells produce H2S along with methane and crude.

Don’t fear this stuff in this situation.


64 posted on 06/18/2010 7:45:34 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: The Theophilus

Well put!!


65 posted on 06/18/2010 7:46:27 AM PDT by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

LOL organismic (sic) should be organisms.

we regret the error.


66 posted on 06/18/2010 7:48:19 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

OK, just let a nuclear sub troll the depths trailing the sled. I like it!

Clever thinking. We’d need an electrical engineer and an oceanographer to work it out, but it might work.


67 posted on 06/18/2010 7:49:54 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

There’s been criticism about restrictions on news media and other determined observers who aren’t allowed over or near the spill.

Do you think it’s because of the gasses?

Another dumb question. Patience, please. I’m just trying to understand. (Nice to find someone here with actual knowledge, not just opininon.)


68 posted on 06/18/2010 7:51:32 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

I believe that “they” are restricting access to good information, ‘cuz good information is certainly ABSENT in the general media.

Now, since we have already had the spectacle of a reporter swimming in the crude (freaking idiot) I can understand why they don’t want IDIOT reporters overflying the spill area trying to get a story that’ll win a Pullitzer.

I *DO* wish “they” would publish better REAL data and information so we can bypass the ignorant MSM.

Also, as a private pilot, I can understand why they want to restrict the airspace to avoid accidents and mid airs and rescues.


69 posted on 06/18/2010 7:57:59 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
geological layering shows a layer of hydrogen sulfides

What is a layer of hydrogen sulfides? Hydrogen sulfide is a gas.

And I seriously doubt that the hydrogen sulfide amount in the gas venting from that well represents any threat to us.

70 posted on 06/18/2010 8:00:59 AM PDT by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS
....time to quit fooling around and nuke the well.

We also need to nuke all the active volcanoes so they won't delay air travel, and nuke all the fault lines so we won't have any more earthquakes.

: )

71 posted on 06/18/2010 8:04:57 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
No, I'm just amused at the number of people who claim to be of Cherokee ancestry.

Same people claim they were at Woodstock, too.

72 posted on 06/18/2010 8:10:07 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

It’s related to the discussions of the Iridium layer — what killed the dinos: a meteor (which uniformly scattered Iridium around the earth’s crust) or a huge volcanic eruption which showered the earth in ash, darkened the skies, polluted the air and rain (with hydrogen-sulfides of various kinds) and resulted in a uniform layer of sulfide deposits around the earth.


73 posted on 06/18/2010 8:13:14 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

In this field it’s always by mass fraction. No engineer does cuts by volume with the exception of chemical engineers at the plant who like SCF because that converts directly to mole fraction. Moreover, 40% NtGas implies plenty of higher hydrocarbons. A typical cut of that 40% would be 75% methane.


74 posted on 06/18/2010 8:15:47 AM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
The nuke would go off at least couple of miles under the seabed, next to the pipeline.

So, all we need to do is dig a tunnel a couple of miles under the seabed, big enough to put a nuke in and get it properly positioned. How long will it take to drill the tunnel? Who is going to handle and place the nuke, oil-workers ?

How long will it take the government to modify a nuke that they can put under the water at such high pressures? How long will it take the administration to authorize such a procedure?

75 posted on 06/18/2010 8:15:53 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Not a forum as such but does carry info on the Spill.

Rig Zone

http://www.rigzone.com/


76 posted on 06/18/2010 8:16:36 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag; autumnraine
LOTS of land-based wells in Texas and Louisiana are posted with poison gas signs because the wells produce H2S along with methane and crude.

H2S makes gas "sour", right? And "sour" wells are common in the salt domes structures along the Texas/Louisiana coast. Also in the California oil fields, around Bakersfield and even inside L.A. (Signal Hill).

There's even a town in Texas named Sour Lake -- so called because H2S bubbles up thru the lake and the whole area smells like rotten eggs.

It's a poison, to be sure. But, if the concentration is high enough to smell, it's still far from deadly. If it's high enough to knock you out, that's another matter.

77 posted on 06/18/2010 8:16:50 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
Is there a possibility that this collected methane could blow up?

The ocean floor has been releasing methane for billions of years, and it hasn't happened yet.

78 posted on 06/18/2010 8:18:48 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

Thanks. THAT makes sense. Not that an AP reporter would know the difference between moles and mass.

Since this is a leak/release instead of a controlled extraction, could that be why the mass fraction of methane is so high?


79 posted on 06/18/2010 8:19:50 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

I meant to include the following which is a Louisiana site that covers a lot of issues for the state. It has a lot items on the spill.

The Hayride

http://thehayride.com/


80 posted on 06/18/2010 8:20:26 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson