Read the definition.. sodomy = homosexuality..
This issue isn’t about “private consensual adult behaviour” its the Trojan horse method of attack by homosexual activists and advocacy groups and their perverse effort to legally legitimize the behavior of homosexuality in the courts and by legislation. Should homosexual marriage be legalized then by judicial fiat homosexuality would be legitimized across the board. This means that school children, by law would be taught that homosexual behavior is a “safe” and “normal” alternative “sexual lifestyle choice” and by law parents will have no grounds to object (regardless of the negative spiritual, moral, psychological, biological, and medical consequences) IOW unconditional approval and acceptance of perversion, kowtow to the sodomites or else.
I’ll ask again, are you a Texan?
Actually, the definitions you reference, from the Legal and Cultural Dictionary, say pretty much what I said: sodomy generally means oral and anal sex between two people. A major example of sodomy is, of course homosexual sex, esp. between men, but the term is broad enough to include a lot else besides.
I agree with you about the whole issue of homosexual marriage. It is, of course, all about legitimising homosexual behaviour and, gradually, criminalising dissent. Otherwise, why push for “marriage”? There is no protection afforded by marriage that two people can’t obtain by private legal contract.
But sodomy laws have already been struck down by the US Supreme Court, and, according to this article, the GOP in Texas is proposing to bring them back. Is that something you are in agreement with? I really don’t think there’s much public support for such a move, it would create more problems than it would solve, and it shouldn’t be a priority for conservatives (at this time).