Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aSeattleConservative; friendly_doc; Dr. Eckleburg
Enforcement of public decency laws has never been deemed as "mischievous". We have laws on the books that prevent law enforcement from kicking in doors without probable cause. Your libertarian beliefs is what got our society into the trouble that it's in today, it's time we get back to the values of God, not moral relativist man.

If you're talking about enforcement of PUBLIC decency laws, that's one area in which I definitely take issue with the extremist Libertarians -- as long as we have "public commons" (and I'll leave the arguments for privatizing roads and parks, etc., for another day), then as a taxpayer I consider myself a "part owner" of those public commons; and as a shareholder, I think I have every right to cast my vote in favor of upholding some moral standards in those public commons. "Friendly_Doc", don't do it in the streets and scare the horses.

On the other hand, Seattle -- at the very moment you step off the public sidewalk and onto my private property, you lose any moral authority to regulate what sort of private foreplay my wife and I might see fit to enjoy in the privacy of our own home. That's not the enforcement of Biblical Virtue; it's a Trespassing, which is a Biblical Sin. If a man is not committing one of the Five Great Harms identified in Romans 13:1-10 by the Apostle Paul as grounds for Government prosecution (Murder, Adultery, Theft, Fraud, and/or "covetous" Abuse & Malfeasance), then His Home is His Castle. Period.

75 posted on 06/24/2010 9:35:02 AM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Christian_Capitalist; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; wmfights
Seems like a workable plan.

It gets somewhat trickier when two homosexuals, in the privacy of their own home, want to adopt a child, which to my way of thinking, is criminal child abuse.

I would want those same men prevented from adopting a child for exactly those activities they admit to doing in the privacy of their own home.

Pinging some Christian lawyers for their input.

76 posted on 06/24/2010 9:48:00 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Christian_Capitalist

LOL..I didn’t say anything about “doing it in the streets”!

For the umpteenth time, the linked article is about the reintroduction of sodomy laws, which criminalise certain sex acts between adults acting IN PRIVATE.


109 posted on 06/24/2010 3:08:54 PM PDT by friendly_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Christian_Capitalist
If a man is not committing one of the Five Great Harms identified in Romans 13:1-10 by the Apostle Paul as grounds for Government prosecution (Murder, Adultery, Theft, Fraud, and/or "covetous" Abuse & Malfeasance), then His Home is His Castle. Period.

You obviously read the Christian libertarian version of the Bible. Here's what the New American Standard Bible says: "For this, "(K)YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY, YOU SHALL NOT MURDER, YOU SHALL NOT STEAL, YOU SHALL NOT COVET," and if there is any other commandment, it is summed up in this saying, "(L)YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF."
Link to Romans 13

God's laws cover a wide spectrum of sin, and He commands civil government to enforce His laws.

137 posted on 06/24/2010 5:40:07 PM PDT by aSeattleConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson