Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOST ratification would sacrifice sovereignty, weaken military
The US Report ^ | 23 Jun 2010 | Chris Carter

Posted on 06/23/2010 8:35:10 PM PDT by Crush

For nearly 30 years, the United Nations has sought US ratification of the onerous Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). Although numerous presidents have supported LOST - formally known as the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea - fortunately, the Senate has never managed to ratify the treaty.

What is LOST and why should it concern the American voter?

We ask Cliff Kincaid, editor of the Accuracy in Media Report and president of America's Survival, Inc. . Kincaid has led a national education campaign about LOST.

Chris Carter: How does LOST threaten American sovereignty?

Cliff Kincaid: This treaty is the biggest giveaway of American sovereignty and resources since the Panama Canal Treaty. It gives the United Nations bureaucracy control over the oceans of the world -- seven-tenths of the world's surface. It sets up an International Seabed Authority to decide who gets access to oil, gas and minerals in international waters. The companies that get those rights to harvest those resources have to pay a global tax to the International Seabed Authority.

Carter: You wrote that the passage of LOST "could be the final nail in the coffin of U.S. Naval superiority." How so?

KINCAID: It would cement in place a procedure to use the treaty, rather than Navy ships, to safeguard U.S. interests. That would cause a further decline in the number of Navy ships, on the ground that we don’t need them.

Carter: If LOST weakens our military, why do you think the Joint Chiefs support the treaty?

(Excerpt) Read more at theusreport.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: lost; un

1 posted on 06/23/2010 8:35:14 PM PDT by Crush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crush
Everything about this regime is aimed at loss of sovereignty, weakening our defenses, ruining the economy, crippling capitalism, adding to the welfare rolls and paying off the Democratic pressure groups (unions, teachers, ACORN, leftist academia, etc.) and lowering us to the level of Third World status. Why should this treaty be any different?
2 posted on 06/23/2010 8:41:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Don't care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A "Natural Born" citizen requires two US parents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush
Ah, yes the U.S. Navy's new slogan:

"Global force for good"

3 posted on 06/23/2010 9:06:37 PM PDT by SlaveNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative; kristinn; Nachum; rush

ping


4 posted on 06/23/2010 10:14:20 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray, Pray, Pray. Stop Barrystroika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson