Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58
You are a liberal, based on your posts of the past.

You are a fool, based on your posts of the past.

You want the least conservative candidate to win.

I want the more conservative candidate to win, which is why I'm backing Moran.

There is, absolutely, NO conservative reason to oppose Tiahrt, in his race against Moran.

And I suppose you would also say that there is, absolutely, NO conservative reason to oppose McCain? Or that there was, absolutely, NO conservative reason to oppose Fiorina? You fair weather conservatives make me laugh.

33 posted on 06/25/2010 5:11:05 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
You are aware, are you not:

McCain has endorsed Moran!

So, you attack McCain, yet you have no worry that McCain and YOU are on the same side, in this contest?

35 posted on 06/25/2010 5:15:41 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

“NO conservative reason to oppose Fiorina?”


Tom Campbell was the solid front runner in that race and was breezing to victory, Palin’s endorsement only days before the voting started, bumped Campbell to a second place finish.

“Campbell supports abortion rights and gay marriage, and argues that Boxer’s greatest asset against either of his two Republican opponents, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina and state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, would be the state’s decidedly un-conservative social views.

“She has always been able to move the debate over to the social issues. She will not be able to do that against me,” Campbell told POLITICO.”

“During the campaign for U.S. Senate in 2000, Campbell touted his 100 percent pro-choice voting record. He opposed a ban on “partial birth’ abortions, one of the most horrific abortion practices. (”Conservatives Agonize Backing Campbell,” Roll Call, August 7, 2000.)

Campbell in 1992 made abortion the center stage of his campaign. In the 1992 election, Campbell’s TV ad ran with the following caption: “For choice, for jobs, for U.S. Senate.” In another ad, he said, “I’m pro-choice and one of the most conservative members of Congress when it comes to spending.”In a Republican debate, he described his abortion views, as good for voters “looking for someone who is willing to break with the party line from time to time.” (Gerry Braun, “Herschensohn Won’t Pledge to Back GOP Pick; Senate Opponents Renew Acrimony in Last Debate,” San Diego Union Tribune, June 1, 1992.)


39 posted on 06/25/2010 5:53:20 PM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson