Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donley: Air Force Not Ready To Develop 'Minuteman IV' Follow-On ICBM
Inside Defense ^ | 6/23/2010 | Carlo Muñoz

Posted on 06/25/2010 2:42:09 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Despite an ongoing Defense Department review of potential follow-on options for the Air Force's premiere intercontinental ballistic missile program, development of a new ICBM system will not be one of those options, Air Force Secretary Michael Donley said today.

While the final results and subsequent recommendations from the Minuteman III ICBM review are not due for months, the service is not ready to dedicate funding or other resources toward the development of a new nuclear missile, Donley said during a breakfast in Washington.

“We have already taken steps to get [the Minuteman III] to 2020; now we are focused on getting it to 2030,” Donley said. “I do not yet think we are at the point where we are ready to make a commitment to a . . . Minuteman IV [ICBM]. We are just not at that point.”

Mandated by the Defense Department’s new Nuclear Posture Review, the ongoing evaluation of the Minuteman III ICBM has focused on the weapon's viability beyond 2030, and potential future basing options in the continental United States.

Currently, DOD has 450 Minuteman III ICBMs deployed across the continental United States, each with one to three warheads. However, U.S. and Russian officials agreed to set a limit a limit of 1,550 accountable strategic warheads, along with a separate limit of 700 deployed ICBMs.

START negotiators also agreed to cut the number of warheads on all Minuteman III ICBMs to one per missile, as part of the new START treaty agreed to by the two countries earlier this year.

While DOD and the Air Force are not in a position to begin exploring development of a new ICBM, should the Pentagon and the service eventually decide to stand up a new program, there may not be a viable industrial base to support that effort

(Excerpt) Read more at defense.iwpnewsstand.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; ballisticmissile; departmentofdefense; dfense; globalstrike; icbm; michaeldonley; minutemaniii; minutemaniv; minutemanmissile; nuclearweapons; pentagon; sac; start; usaf

1 posted on 06/25/2010 2:42:13 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Congress has abdicated its constitution duties for convenience and internal political gain!


2 posted on 06/25/2010 2:48:12 PM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968

Ping


3 posted on 06/25/2010 2:50:11 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Treason.


4 posted on 06/25/2010 2:52:25 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

War.


5 posted on 06/25/2010 3:01:12 PM PDT by TwoLegsGood ("...my sin is ever before me" - King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Bring back the neutron bomb!


6 posted on 06/25/2010 3:07:03 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

We won’t test our nuclear bombs to see if they still work so why build a new ICBM if it only will carry a fizzle bomb?


7 posted on 06/25/2010 4:45:44 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
We won’t test our nuclear bombs to see if they still work so why build a new ICBM if it only will carry a fizzle bomb?

Or we'll just do what we're doing with our manned space program: We'll get the Russians to provide the lift...

8 posted on 06/25/2010 5:43:55 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

How about re-activate just 4 Peacekeepers.
2 pointed to NK.
2 pointed to Iran.
Save the Minutemen for China and Russia.


9 posted on 06/25/2010 6:30:21 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

All of them are apart of the Minotaur space project and some of those silos at Whiteman AFB have been imploded.


10 posted on 06/25/2010 6:40:39 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

You may have some servicable silos at FE Warren AFB


11 posted on 06/25/2010 6:44:21 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

I do have a correction. Whiteman AFB held Minuteman missiles. FE Warren AFB(400 Missile Squadron) held the Peacekeeper missile.


12 posted on 06/25/2010 6:46:52 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

13 posted on 06/25/2010 6:53:23 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson