Skip to comments.
8-lane bridge seems dead-end idea
The Columbian ^
| Saturday, June 26, 2010
| Erik Robinson
Posted on 06/26/2010 2:47:25 PM PDT by Willie Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: Willie Green
Ha....we got light rail running 18 hours a day in Seattle...you can watch the empty rail cars go by.
To: Willie Green; Irisshlass; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
Willie the Green promotes MORE huge government spending!
We need to provide more light rail to stop this insanity.
42
posted on
06/26/2010 7:19:53 PM PDT
by
narses
( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
To: narses
We need more light rail because it is so safe and environmentally sound.
43
posted on
06/26/2010 7:48:53 PM PDT
by
MarkBsnr
( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
To: Willie Green
I don’t want any toll on this bridge. Leave the existing bridge in place; it’s paid for.
The last thing we need is a toll bridge with light rail. The voters in Vancouver have already voted against it. A regular lane of traffic moves many times more people than a light rail line.
By the way, this bridge is not intended to have any more actual through lanes than the current bridge. They’re just counting entry/exit lanes as regular lanes.
44
posted on
06/27/2010 6:35:51 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Just another Tenther)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson