Not one in 10 of the pols on our side denounce amnesty as far as Fiorina has, and the reality is that she has to reach out to the Hispanic vote if she’s got a chance to defeat Boxer.
If in doing so she were to flip flop on the stand she’s taken in English I’d see the reason for concern. But I haven’t seen that and every CA Freeper should be energetically backing her at this point.
She has already said she is against the Arizona immigration law and claims there is a racist tone from the backers of the law.
And it is not just about amnesty that she won’t answer.What about Roe V Wade???? Ban on Assault weapons??? The list goes on and on.
She is going to be the worst of the RINOs..and a Muslim lover as well.
She is for cap and trade, against the immigration law, for internet tax, dont know if she will overturn Roe V Wade because she won’t answer the question, doesn’t own a gun, won’t answer the question about path to citzenship ( as in amnesty because we already have a path to citizenship in the law)..oh and she ran HP into the ground and let it sell product to Iran through a ..ahem...third party.
But Hey, Sarah Palin liked her...so people listened.
And they are going to be sorry.
She didn't "denounce" amnesty.
Asked about what she would do with those already here illegally if the border were secured, she was evasive.“I don’t think voters are going to tolerate a discussion of what we’re going to do next until we do what actually has to be done, period,” she said. “So I’m not prepared to even discuss what we do next.”
She did, however, say that she could not vote for a comprehensive bill along the lines of McCain-Kennedy.
http://spectator.org/blog/2010/05/03/fiorina-on-immigration
Tepid and evasive.