Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banking on trouble
NY Post ^ | June 27, 2010 | Editorial

Posted on 06/27/2010 3:15:21 AM PDT by Scanian

President Obama was quick to claim victory at week’s end, after congressional negotiators hammered out a final bill regulating the financial sector, saying it provides “90% of what I proposed.”

But just how the nearly 2,000-page bill will affect New York — which relies upon financial institutions for a major share of its tax base — remains unclear.

After all, as Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd admitted: “No one will know until this is actually in place how it works.”

Which is why Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) warns of “three unintended consequences on every page of this bill.”

Not exactly reassuring.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: derivatives; doddbill; federalreserve; wallstreet

1 posted on 06/27/2010 3:15:23 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Exactly what we expect from the RAT crooks.


2 posted on 06/27/2010 3:22:30 AM PDT by DeaconRed (I am dreaming of the day when ZERO is Gone. It's a beautiful dream. . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

later


3 posted on 06/27/2010 3:26:44 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Yeah, here we go again. Another multi-thousand page tome being shoved through with zero scrutiny (”...gotta pass it so that we can know what’s in it...”).

The Dem Leftists are taking us down the tubes so damned fast and SO easily it is maddening.


4 posted on 06/27/2010 3:33:20 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Can this crap be repealed?


5 posted on 06/27/2010 4:09:32 AM PDT by G-Man 1 (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Like Obamacare, this piece of cr*p is unconstitutional! Regulating finance is not a enumerated power in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution! It’s merely to exert more control over the people. It’s becoming increasingly obvious civil disobedience will be the only way to reverse the marxist trend.


6 posted on 06/27/2010 4:14:38 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G-Man 1
Can this crap be repealed?

Practically speaking, no. No major piece of financial regulation has ever been repealed, no matter how bad the consequences.

Even if it were, the individual damage to firms can never be compensated for; the overall damage to our financial system as years of this dreck accumulates is inestimable.

It's like the equally stupid gun control: it took years, as enforcement activities gradually increased under the NFA, for the full extent of its damage to be clear, and then with passage of the GCA, our constitutional right to keep and bear arms took an even greater blow.

7 posted on 06/27/2010 4:58:49 AM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Which is why Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) warns of “three unintended consequences on every page of this bill.”

They aren’t ‘unintended’, Jeb. Why can’t the GOP, even the good ones, get a clue?


8 posted on 06/27/2010 5:10:49 AM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

“congressional negotiators hammered out a final bill”

“Hammered out”? More like “poured into a mold and allowed to cool”.

In the Tabernacle In The Wilderness, the “candlestick”, actually a lampstand of seven oil lamps, was a foretype of the Messiah, and was of one piece of gold beaten into shape. This is in contrast to a religious person, who is represented by mass-produced products made by pouring liquid into a mold that then hardens.

What’s my point? This bill is like a Chinese knockoff of something worthwhile, and it’s a tool for our tyrannical government to arbitrarily give orders to the rest of us.


9 posted on 06/27/2010 5:27:47 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

“congressional negotiators hammered out a final bill”

“Hammered out”? More like “poured into a mold and allowed to cool”.

In the Tabernacle In The Wilderness, the “candlestick”, actually a lampstand of seven oil lamps, was a foretype of the Messiah, and was of one piece of gold beaten into shape. This is in contrast to a religious person, who is represented by mass-produced products made by pouring liquid into a mold that then hardens.

What’s my point? This bill is like a Chinese knockoff of something worthwhile, and it’s a tool for our tyrannical government to arbitrarily give orders to the rest of us.


10 posted on 06/27/2010 5:28:45 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G-Man 1

It creates a new agency and agencies require funding. Perhaps this beast can be starved along with Obamacare until enough conservatives are in place to truly repeal them — and a president who won’t veto the repeals.


11 posted on 06/27/2010 5:44:04 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101

I suspect that it contains both intended AND unintended.

It will be like Obamacare once it is thoroughly analyzed — everybody will have his own favorite gripe about it and people will be calling for repeal of this POS also.


12 posted on 06/27/2010 5:49:14 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
No major piece of financial regulation has ever been repealed, no matter how bad the consequences.

Well, now that I think a bit more about it, parts of Glass-Steagall Banking Act were repealed, and indeed, this current bill I believe actually reinstates portions of the 1933 Banking Act --- though with 2000 pages in it, who knows what's actually in there?

13 posted on 06/27/2010 6:51:44 AM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd admitted: “No one will know until this is actually in place how it works.”
How long does a progressive democrat have to work at it to reach the point of insane?.


14 posted on 06/27/2010 7:27:33 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson