To: manc
No, look at the condition of England today. They have been on a course of self-destruction since the late 1940's. It's not at all unreasonable to ask the question; "would they have been better off if they had lost". It's not all that unreasonable. As I've stated, the Germans had no intention of destroying British Civilization. The British have done a spectacular job of that themselves.
So what's so unreasonable of asking the question? Could the German's have done better? Germany, despite their problems is in much better shape and has a much better chance of preserving their civilization than what Britain does.
Remember that great Kinks song: There's no England anymore?
55 posted on
06/27/2010 11:16:25 AM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
To: truthguy
So what's so unreasonable of asking the question? Could the German's have done better? Germany, despite their problems is in much better shape and has a much better chance of preserving their civilization than what Britain does.Have you ever seen "It Happened Here", there was also a documentary called "Hitler's England" that detailed the Nazi plans for England should Germany have occupied her.
58 posted on
06/27/2010 11:18:06 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: truthguy
the whole west has gone to crap including America but I’ll take it over a bunch of NAZI mass murderers being in control of us.
The NAZIS were scum
59 posted on
06/27/2010 11:19:26 AM PDT by
manc
(WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson