To: NormsRevenge
No, not an act of terrorism, but clearly an act of war and a violation of the armistice. It should have been met with swift and decisive military force. Instead, the feckless reaction of South Korea and her allies only emboldens the NORKS.
To: OldDeckHand; Graybeard58
No, not an act of terrorism, but clearly an act of war and a violation of the armistice. It should have been met with swift and decisive military force. Instead, the feckless reaction of South Korea and her allies only emboldens the NORKS. Exactly right.
15 posted on
06/28/2010 11:22:54 AM PDT by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: OldDeckHand
44 posted on
06/28/2010 12:08:46 PM PDT by
TheDon
("Citizen" of Kalifornia, USSA)
To: OldDeckHand
“No, not an act of terrorism, but clearly an act of war and a violation of the armistice. It should have been met with swift and decisive military force. Instead, the feckless reaction of South Korea and her allies only emboldens the NORKS.”
+100
55 posted on
06/28/2010 12:39:30 PM PDT by
jhpigott
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson