[Rome2000]

In case anybody is still under the illusion that the "rule of law" is anything other than what the guy with the most judges in his pocket says it is , I give you today's 5-4 vote.

So these 4 scumbags can just vote to nullify the 2nd amendment without consequence?

So if the communist in chief gets to appoint a third sex pervert bull dyke marxist SOB to the Supreme Court, all of a sudden the original intent of the Founders with respect to the Constitution means nothing?

WAR is on the horizon.

[hal ogen]

The “shocker” is that 4 of the so-called supremes voted against the 2nd amendment. These leftists are truly in need of an education.

[budwiesest]

if the communist in chief gets to appoint a third sex pervert bull dyke marxist SOB to the Supreme Court,

Great description, if I don't say so myself (from a non-wise, non-latina ;^)

We shouldn't be too hard on these communist wanna-bees. Let's say a couple of cities go up in smoke, for instance, it's possible they might have reservations and possibly a change of heart at the sight of all the death and mayhem brought by those who put them in office. (Liberals Gone Wild)

[jschwartz]

You sort of said it all, but here’s the big picture:

They are really suggesting that the states’ legislatures may decided for themselves whether to engage in useless feel good nullification of the second amendment. In Montana, you would have more guns than people and no crime. In Chicago, you would have no registered guns and a murder a minute. It’s up to the states.

The irony is that the states are circumscribed on abortion, G-d forbid anyone has to drive to a Liberal state for that! Read Roe v. Wade about a “right” under the “penumbra” of 4 amendments that apply to all states.

The historical analogy though is the court packing scheme of the 30’s to push through a socialist agenda. If Manhattan Bull Dyke slips by and one more judge dies, you better move to Montana or Idaho.