Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Normal: The Second Amendment After Heller and McDonald
Pajamas Media ^ | June 28 | Glenn Reynolds

Posted on 06/29/2010 11:32:20 AM PDT by AJKauf

I’ve been interested in the Second Amendment for a long time, but for a long time, it wasn’t really part of the Constitution.

Oh, I mean it was part of the Constitution — right there between the First Amendment on one side, and the Third Amendment (the only part of the Bill of Rights that really works — when did you last hear of troops being quartered in someone’s house?) on the other. But in “mainstream” constitutional discourse, it just didn’t exist....

/////

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mcdonald; secondamendment

1 posted on 06/29/2010 11:32:22 AM PDT by AJKauf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
Oh, I mean it was part of the Constitution — right there between the First Amendment on one side, and the Third Amendment ...

DEMS prolly think that the Founders put the 2nd Amendment was put in the Constitution as a placeholder ...

2 posted on 06/29/2010 11:35:25 AM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
The left has always believed that the 2nd amendment only applied to celebrity body guards. ;)
3 posted on 06/29/2010 11:42:43 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

I don’t think Heller or McDonald changed much or at least anything of substance. It hasn’t changed the minds of millions of liberals who would happily vote our liberties away. Its hasn’t changed the ways of heavy handed state and local govts. They’ll still try to disarm the populace. So what if a bunch of guys in black robes decided it would be this way. If we continue on our way what use will the rule of law be to us personally or societally? Law and court proceedings only mean something in societies that respect them. Yet our Congress OKed ‘the wise latina’ and will shortly do the same w/ Kagan. We didn’t become a nation b/c lawyers said it was OK.


4 posted on 06/29/2010 12:04:43 PM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 556x45

From Hussein to Schumer, from Bloomberg to Shortshanks in Chicago, the left has worked for decades to overturn the 2nd amendment for one reason and one reason ONLY...it is just TOO dangerous to enslave an ARMED people. The Framers knew this and made certain that citizens would have the means to overthrow a criminal, tyrannical state. Leftists have tried to REMOVE those means but have so far failed to get that 5th radical leftist on the court.


5 posted on 06/29/2010 12:52:47 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 556x45
I don’t think Heller or McDonald changed much or at least anything of substance.

''Heller'' laid a foundation; ''McDonald'' is the one-story house. Hopefully, we will be able to add additional floors.

6 posted on 06/29/2010 1:07:45 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

No. Since for Libs the Constitiution is a “living [breathing] document”., the Second Amendment existed in suspended animation until the National Guard was founded, at which point it took life, guaranteeing the National Guard the right to keep and bear arms [when in uniform.


7 posted on 06/29/2010 1:10:53 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

BTW, why are the timestamps fast by over two minutes?


8 posted on 06/29/2010 1:15:45 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
"DEMS prolly think that the Founders put the 2nd Amendment was put in the Constitution as a placeholder ... "

Well of course. To them it was just a "zero". To be ignored.

9 posted on 06/29/2010 1:31:26 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Neither of you guys are getting this. The ‘living Constitution’ crowd is bent on making a mockery of original intent aka a society built on the law of relativism which is really nothing more than lawlessness. There will be no 2ndA as we know it. As I said, when we allow lawyers to tell us what the law says we’re in trouble. Its crystal clear what the original intent was. The big question is when push comes to shove how will the American people rule. Thats the ruling that really matters!


10 posted on 06/30/2010 5:50:08 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson