Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Stark Mocks Border Security Advocates: Who Are You Going to Kill Today?
fox news ^ | 6/29/2010 | fox news

Posted on 06/30/2010 3:49:30 AM PDT by tobyhill

A California congressman known for edgy sarcasm mocked an opponent of illegal immigration during a town hall meeting last week, asking, "Who are you going to kill today?" before the constituent, a self-identified Minuteman, posed his question.

Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., no stranger to controversy, mocked the idea that the borders are not secure when asked about the federal government's lack of activity on border security.

"We can't get enough Minutemen armed. We'd like to get all the Minutemen armed so they can stop shooting people here," Stark said.

Eventually, members of the audience urged Stark to offer a serious answer.

"If you knew anything about our borders, you would know that's not the case. Our borders are quite secure, thank you," Stark said, drawing jeers.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2010 3:49:33 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Stark is a typical California loud mouthed punk.

He only gets away with this crap because the people here are so weak, and let thugs and gangbangers like him get away with crap like that.

In other words, they're liberals.

2 posted on 06/30/2010 3:55:57 AM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out!! The Americans are On the March!! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“If you knew anything about our borders, you would know that’s not the case. Our borders are quite secure, thank you,” Stark said, drawing jeers.

Let’s put Mr. Stark out on the section of Arizona border that the Border Patrol agent’s union leaders have defined as too dangerous for their members to guard (for just one night), and then ask him if he might want to amend his comments.

Mr. Stark is either too cowardly to do the right thing, deluded into thinking that there is no problem, or simply being a politician.


3 posted on 06/30/2010 4:04:58 AM PDT by Pecos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Mr Stark needs a Jethro Gibbs style whack upside the head


4 posted on 06/30/2010 4:06:13 AM PDT by screaming eagle2 (bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I’m reading a great book, Term Limits, by Vince Flynn.


5 posted on 06/30/2010 4:09:07 AM PDT by DocH (Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“Rep. Stark Mocks Border Security Advocates: Who Are You Going to Kill Today?”

Well, Mister Stark, how’s about we start with a few idiot congresscritters and senaturds?


6 posted on 06/30/2010 4:20:32 AM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Drop this loud mouthed pu$$y right into the middle of a zeta drug gang mule train... his answer as to who is “next” will be up close and personal.

LLS

7 posted on 06/30/2010 4:23:36 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Do the voters in his district want to reelect him?

Does he represent them well?


8 posted on 06/30/2010 4:25:51 AM PDT by Former MSM Viewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

That ain’t ‘edgy sarcasm’. It’s the tip of their satanic rage poking through.


9 posted on 06/30/2010 4:31:12 AM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Let us hope his constituents “help him” find new opportunities in Nov. Let us pray for it.


10 posted on 06/30/2010 4:36:23 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill; whatisthetruth; dynachrome

I cannot say what I think of that elitist “bleep” on this forum.


11 posted on 06/30/2010 4:39:32 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Who are you going to kill in his mother’s womb today?


12 posted on 06/30/2010 4:56:05 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ( DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former MSM Viewer

His District would elect the Dem. candidate if he was a convicted child molester.


13 posted on 06/30/2010 5:02:25 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
I have a question for this jerk and other leftists like him. If having no borders or immigration laws is such a great idea, then why aren't any of the supposed enlightened nations ( the ones you like to rub in our face as to how much better they are at everything than us ) taking the lead in this for their own countries? Still waiting.
14 posted on 06/30/2010 5:02:35 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Well, Pete, the thought arises of slathering you in brown makeup and letting you loose at the border...but no, it would be wrong, that’s for sure.


15 posted on 06/30/2010 5:10:20 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

This is the classic example of how there’s something very wrong with our current election system.


16 posted on 06/30/2010 5:16:53 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

stark acts like this and the people of his district still vote him in...??...they deserve what they get....


17 posted on 06/30/2010 5:19:50 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Mr Starks,

who are you going to let be killed by an illegal alien today?


18 posted on 06/30/2010 5:21:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

That’s why he makes those sarcastic and snide remarks. He knows he will be reelected no matter what outrageous things he says. He’s a bully and what he really needs is a smackdown or an ass-whoopin’.


19 posted on 06/30/2010 5:22:16 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.

"The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the confederacy of fools that made him their prince. "The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."


20 posted on 06/30/2010 5:23:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson